Don't Show Obama This Report About Who Really Is Behind The Syrian Chemical Attacks Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/30/2013 - 10:33 As we showed mere days ago, it appears the truth of who the real puppet-master in the Middle-East is becoming plainer to see. The incredibly frank discussion between Saudi's spy-chief Prince Bandar and Russia's Putin exposed a much deeper plot is afoot and the following details from the actual people on the ground in the chemically-attacked region of Syria suggest Obama is playing right into the Saudi's plan. While Obama is 'certain' that the chemical attacks took place on al-Assad's orders, as MPN reports, "from numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, a different picture emerges. Many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the dealing gas attack."
O.T. Henry David Thoreau didn't believe that he should have to pay taxes to fund a war with Mexico or a government that allows slavery, so he spent a night in jail in 1846. His friend, Ralph Waldo Emerson, came to visit him and asked, "Why are you here (in jail)?" Thoreau supposedly replied, "Why are you out there (not in jail)?"
There has been some dispute whether this exchange ever actually happened.
Now I'm going to put on my old tattered hat of once being an insider on security issues in that region and let you in on a "secret."
It was the Syrian government which shelled that area with nerve agents, and no one else.
When John Kerry says "it is known that.." he is speaking accurately.
The Syrian government has stockpiles of several nerve agents including Sarin and VX and has used them several times before with particular artillary and shells designed for their use.
All this came about in the 1990s after what happened in Hama and Allepo years earlier.
Thanks, MITmichael. I don't know what to believe except one thing -- the U.S. shouldn't start another war.
Here's a sample of the crazy information that's out there, for ordinary readers to somehow figure out the truth in our spare time. Zero Hedge today has this:
Fact... Or Scandal? Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/02/2013 20:40 -0400 (...) If factual, the implications of this second follow up email are self-explanatory: the wife of Colonel MacDonald responds to a sincere query by what appears to be a friend or acquaintance, about the tragic fate of the Syrian children that perished in the chemical attack, to which the response is: "I saw it either and got afraid very much. But Tony comforted me. He said the kids weren't hurt, it was done for cameras. So you don't worry, my dear."
The war is already started and unless somebody brings it to an end it's going to keep on rolling along...
I don't believe the US has any national security interests in the outcome of this war, or any other war. I don't believe the US had any interests in Vietnam in 1968 for that matter. No matter who wins in Syria no American's life will be harmed one way or another.
But still...
If it were myself in the White House I would work to kill Assad and all his buddies because I don't like them - personally.
And I wouldn't give a shit if al-qaeda took over the country.
That's just the way I am and I admit it when others won't.
From the Zero Hedge blog:
ReplyDeleteDon't Show Obama This Report About Who Really Is Behind The Syrian Chemical Attacks
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/30/2013 - 10:33
As we showed mere days ago, it appears the truth of who the real puppet-master in the Middle-East is becoming plainer to see. The incredibly frank discussion between Saudi's spy-chief Prince Bandar and Russia's Putin exposed a much deeper plot is afoot and the following details from the actual people on the ground in the chemically-attacked region of Syria suggest Obama is playing right into the Saudi's plan. While Obama is 'certain' that the chemical attacks took place on al-Assad's orders, as MPN reports, "from numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, a different picture emerges. Many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the dealing gas attack."
O.T.
Henry David Thoreau didn't believe that he should have to pay taxes to fund a war with Mexico or a government that allows slavery, so he spent a night in jail in 1846. His friend, Ralph Waldo Emerson, came to visit him and asked, "Why are you here (in jail)?" Thoreau supposedly replied, "Why are you out there (not in jail)?"
There has been some dispute whether this exchange ever actually happened.
I've been looking at it tonight and I found that it goes back to at least 1865.
The Gas Attack Isn't a "False Flag."
DeleteNow I'm going to put on my old tattered hat of once being an insider on security issues in that region and let you in on a "secret."
It was the Syrian government which shelled that area with nerve agents, and no one else.
When John Kerry says "it is known that.." he is speaking accurately.
The Syrian government has stockpiles of several nerve agents including Sarin and VX and has used them several times before with particular artillary and shells designed for their use.
All this came about in the 1990s after what happened in Hama and Allepo years earlier.
There is no "false flag" here.
ok, that's why we value all your contributions. Happy Labor Day.
DeleteThanks, MITmichael. I don't know what to believe except one thing -- the U.S. shouldn't start another war.
DeleteHere's a sample of the crazy information that's out there, for ordinary readers to somehow figure out the truth in our spare time. Zero Hedge today has this:
Fact... Or Scandal?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/02/2013 20:40 -0400
(...)
If factual, the implications of this second follow up email are self-explanatory: the wife of Colonel MacDonald responds to a sincere query by what appears to be a friend or acquaintance, about the tragic fate of the Syrian children that perished in the chemical attack, to which the response is: "I saw it either and got afraid very much. But Tony comforted me. He said the kids weren't hurt, it was done for cameras. So you don't worry, my dear."
The war is already started and unless somebody brings it to an end it's going to keep on rolling along...
DeleteI don't believe the US has any national security interests in the outcome of this war, or any other war. I don't believe the US had any interests in Vietnam in 1968 for that matter. No matter who wins in Syria no American's life will be harmed one way or another.
But still...
If it were myself in the White House I would work to kill Assad and all his buddies because I don't like them - personally.
And I wouldn't give a shit if al-qaeda took over the country.
That's just the way I am and I admit it when others won't.
I felt the same way about Qaddafi.
DeleteI guarantee you scores of other operators and intl figures felt the same way.
Despite the "rapproachment" of the last years everybody hated that jackass.
And nobody gives a shit if al-qaeda takes over Libya.
The intelligent people in government know al-qaeda is a farce anyway.
Dr. P.,
ReplyDeleteYour tone is sarcastic; it should be HORRIFIC!
EXPRESS YOUR OUTRAGE AND DEMAND EXPOSURE AND ACCOUNTABLILITY FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!
FBI: PLANNING 9-11 DOMESTIC TERROR ATTACK!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/us/fbi-sharpens-scrutiny-of-syrians-in-us-for-signs-of-retaliation.html?_r=0