Friday, September 27, 2013

a link you may enjoy, thx Patriarch.
http://mutaretimes.blogspot.com/2011/08/its-official-col-muammar-gaddafi-is-in.html

8 comments:

  1. http://pieczenik.boards.net/thread/223/muammar-al-gaddafi-second?page=3

    ReplyDelete
  2. Please check your links on this page.... StevePieczenik.com ..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ha ha! Dr pieczenik steals the March once again!!!! Massively important if this turns out to be true that gadaffi is presiding deep in the bowels of Africa! But the very fact that contingency plans were in place to exile him proves the author was spot on in his assessment on the divine rights of kings!! When I've personally mentioned this subject to people in my local bar I was immediately cast as some pantomime villain or jester!!! This if nothing else proves that the real issues the real facts ect are not in the mainstream but on sites such as these and hopefully it will encourage the people to "rub" the surface a little and as the good doctor prescribes, join the discussion!! You don't need a degree or a doctorate for that as I've found!! An opinion or willingness to be educated not only by the host but by my fellow contributors, hee hee let's go get Saddam in that Bentley dealership in Barvikha!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Look at the date on the article. It's two years old.

    But those that believe in all the doubles are jumping all over it.

    Frankly, these "double" assertions are hard to prove one way or the other.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anaconda as you frankly ascertain "doubles" are hard to prove!

      Delete
    2. del stead, is it live or is it Memorex?

      Are the pictures from some earlier visit?

      I don't doubt there are doubles, the issue is whether it is the real McCoy. And, yes, that is hard to prove.

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Consider the source - other articles on the site include an op-ed from an opposition candidate, and a critique of Zimbabwe's educational system, giving the impression that this is not a Mugabe friendly publication. This article, given the context - within a week of the fall of Tripoli - seems geared towards associating two has-been despots with one another. I'm inclined to think this is sheer duplicitous propaganda.

    ReplyDelete