STEVE PIECZENIK TALKS

Hillary’s Bigger Problem with her Emails than Just the Classified Information: Illegal Financial Dealings in the Clinton Foundation.

Unethical Mix of Personal/Public Funding at the State Dept.

I feel compelled to reiterate the tiresome point of the incredible lacunae of any ethics or morals in both Hillary and Bill Clinton—or Billary. Just as I was about to close the door on my blogs concerning the despicable, criminal behavior of Hillary along comes another set of facts that open up my diatribe to even more invectives.

In WSJ’s article entitled “Hillary’s Other Server Scandal” by Kimberley A. Strassel, March 11, 2016, the author points out the following facts about Billary:

▪ HC claims to Univision’s Jorge Ramos, ‘indictment will never happen’—maybe she knows something we don’t know.

▪ Hillary built a private secret internet system to move attention away from the massively corrupt Clinton Foundation.

▪ Immunity was granted to Billary sycophant Bryan Pagliano who set up the ersatz IT system to explain to the 100 plus FBI agents what really happened and what emails passed through it.

▪ Like surrogate daughter Huma Abedin, Bryan was paid extra by the Clintons while working at State—completely illegal.

▪ Similarly, Cheryl Mills was paid by the U.A.E. while she was at State. Cheryl also reviewed Bill’s speaking events while working at State.

▪ Foundation received major cash from Russian mining after State approved its business.

▪ Bill made more than a Baker’s Dozen speeches while the major corporations and businesses were pending approval before Hillary’s State Dept.

▪ Over a dozen donations made to the foundation from companies that were lobbying State.

▪ a Swiss bank sent checks to the foundation after Hillary solved its IRS problems.

▪ Abedin lobbied for Foundation donor to get a presidential appointment.

I know many of you can add more sins/travesties committed by these two culprits. Yet if the Clintons can be absolved of their transgression, then our justice department will be found severely wanting. For want of a nail a kingdom was lost, Shakespeare tells us. So what happens when a surfeit of moral/ethical/financial violations compound each other in our present day Republic? That is the question that Obama, Loretta Lynch and James Comey must answer.

We are now at the crossroads of a defining moment in history. Do we indict a person who has held numerous high positions in more than one administration? Or do we say nothing and absolve her of any wrong doing?
Will we follow Brazil in indicting/convicting their former President Lula da Silva for money laundering which will lead to the inevitable arrest of his Bulgarian Terrorist protégé, President Dilma Rousseff? Or do we make believe that nothing really serious happened; and Hillary was as usual simply sloppy?

Please listen to Bernie Sanders when he keeps on emphasizing the large contributions from Wall Street to Hillary and Bill. Also, Trump is quite astute when he repeats the point that Hillary may not be available to run for the Presidency of the Republic in 2016.

Hillary also ordered the wanton destruction of two viable countries:Iraq and Libya. For that, she has been forgiven by the implicit silence of her loyal Democratic Party. Yet, blood stains remain within her purview for all sorts of past deeds ranging back decades upon decades.

She should remember an old Bosnian proverb:

“Who lies for you will lie against you.” 

It’s just a matter of time before the highly maligned FBI finds their own moral fibers and will pronounce Hillary guilty of crimes against the state. Arthur Koestler, the writer, said the following about self-delusions:

“Nothing is more sad than the death of an illusion [that HC is innocent]!”