Translate

Thursday, August 29, 2013






A Man For All Wars :  Obama the Nobel Peace Prize Winner  with Six Years in Afghanistan; Yemen; Libya;  Pakistan;  Mali; Chad; Sudan; Iraq;  ”Drone Kills of Innocent Civilians.”
On the Fifty Anniversary of Martin Luther King’s March [MLK] on Washington,  Obama,  the first black president of the US,  is engaging in ‘limited military strike’ against Syria.
 
How ironic that on the day of MLK speech which preached the inequality of blacks and the poor in America,  the first black president of the US,  will engage in another  “act of violence”.  The impeding missile strike against Syria for alleged chemical warfare is immoral,  unjustified and against all international laws…..not to mention many are saying the chem attack is possibly a false flag.
The most degrading part of Obama’s unrelenting compulsion for indiscriminate  violence – possibly an ‘addiction’-- is the fact that the US military has to once again cover the incompetence of a novitiate president.   Obama knows nothing about foreign policy and thinks that ‘missiles’ are a BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION TOOL that will PUNISH the Assad regime.
As a professional psychiatrist and ‘regime changer’ for thirty years—Soviet Communism [Russia and East Europe];  Aldo Moro [Italy];  Khmer Rouge [Cambodia]; et al. –there is NO CONCEPTUAL THEORY OR PRACTICE that I know of or have engaged in that involves a military missile strike to change any regime.   Nor will it  modify or change foreign leadership behavior.
  I stand by the former and present USArmy Generals,  including  Shinseki who warned the ‘nefarious incompetent’  Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz that a deployment of 75,000 American troops was not enough to invade Iraq.
  Similarly,   USArmy General Martin Dempsey has had the courage to go in front of the American public and state very clearly that the USG cannot enter into a war in Syria without major troop commitments,  US financial encumbrance,  and serious ‘collateral damage.’
We are experiencing a déjà vu all over again.    Again our US Commanders warn the POTUS and the American public that we cannot enter into a war without basically a ‘full court press’.
 
But what do our civilian leaders,  most of whom have never served in the US military [Clinton, Bush Jr, Obama],  they proceed with war as if war were a pristine encapsulated theoretical concept which can include ‘proportionality’ , ‘deterrence’ and ‘punishment’ as psychological and moral concepts inherent to violence.
  War is violence on STEROIDS.
  I have never met serious senior US military leader who felt that war is a solution to nation state behavior.   But I have met  countless civilians,  usually on the Liberal/ Neocon spectra of ideology who believed  that war was an instrument of behavior modification.
 
War is a simple binary phenomena.   You win or you lose.
  You kill or be killed.
  Not more complicated than that.
  The rest is absolute nonsense.  
By now,  everyone around the worlds knows that Obama had placed himself into a corner of circumlocution,  where he stupidly pronounced the inane foreign policy mantras,  like ‘red line’ for behaviors of nation states.   Next Obama added in haste,  without any understanding of regime change—“President Bashar Assad must go!”
In effect what we American civilians are doing is ENABLING INCOMPETENT CIVILIAN PRESIDENTS to make inane remarks because of their inexperience,  ineptitude and then allow through congress and the press to deploy brave US military troops to invade a county on a false pretext.

  Witness the infamous Colin Powell scene in the UN with DCI George Tenet sitting behind him,  insisting that he had proof of anthrax in a vial of glass as a justification for an invasion of Iraq. 
Powell lied.   Bush Jr. lied.   Cheney Lied.  The DCI lied.  Obama
But America became so inured to Politicians lying that the only recourse was to send brave military personnel to die in the foreign country and then find out in a net assessment of the inane action that we had accomplished nothing more than killing over 350,000 innocent civilians in the region.
So once again the Nobel Peace Prize Potus Obama is on the war path.
  He knows all too well that he does not know anything and can’t affect any change other than create chaos and death in countries like  Libya,  Egypt,  Syria,  Tunisia,  Mali.
  Obama is truly a Man FOR ALL Wars.
  Obama’s never met a war he didn't like.
 
In counterpoint to Obama,  witness the actions of General/President Eisenhower who had witnessed the horrors of war and had lead the massive invasion of Europe in WWII. 
  As president of the US,  his first task was to stop the war in Korea that Truman had incompetently initiated.   Then he prevented another war in Vietnam that  JFK,  LBJ and Nixon  had sadly entered thanks to two incompetent generals and a lying  Sec Def---Maxwell TaylorWestmoreland and Bob McNamara.

There are three basic principles that American Presidents have proven to me over the past fifty years.
  First,  the first victim of war is truth.
  It does not matter what they say it’s all based on lies,  false assumptions and disregard for any human lives, including Americans or foreigners.

Second,   most of the Presidents know almost nothing about human behavior or nation state behavior.   More importantly,  they create false analogies like ’proportionality’ or ‘moral imperatives’ in order to cover up their ignorance/ incompetence/ corrupt nature.

Third,  there is no civilian accountability for the destruction of human  lives or financial drainage in any act of war.   Instead, we Americans don’t want to deal with ‘good’ or ‘bad war’s –wars of choice or necessity—and instead we create memorials and fancy sounding false patriotic adages to justify the unnecessary war.

Americans cannot continue to threaten or enact wars all over the world because of some ‘false sense of importance’ or ‘superiority’ or greed.
  War is mess and dirty.   It’s not something that can be ‘titrated’ or ‘measured’.
  If missiles strike Damascus or Aleppo,  then America must contend with Russia,  Iran,  Hezbollah and the subsequent implosion of a fragile Lebanon.
  Every general knows that Mission Creep is the vouchsafe of a so-called ‘surgical strike’.
  And with ‘mission creep’ we create an iatrogenic disease called ‘WWIII’ where the following countries will react in one or another way:
  Israel,  Turkey,  Saudi Arabia,  UAE,  Jordan,  Iran,  Russia,  China,  Bahrain,  India,  Pakistan……

We are entering a period of FUBAR…
Thanks to the ‘thin red line’ created by Obama,  the Man For All Wars.

I have a dream that one day we will have peace!
  What about that Obama?
I,  who fought in too many wars,  also has a dream on the fiftieth anniversary  of Martin Luther King.
  He was also my hero.
  And so was Malcolm X who was killed violently by Elijah Muhammad and the Black Muslims.
  Let’s not forget him.
  Malcolm X can teach you,  Obama,  a lot about the non-utility of violence.
  

14 comments:

  1. Tony Blair (peace envoy!!!!!!) Says we must intervene against Assad! David Cameron prime minster & William Hague foreign Secretary says we must strike Assad and recalls Parliament early (at great expense)! Fortunately they didn't quite get it there way with opposition political parties and members of the government expressing grave concerns over a cruise missile attack and it also seems less than 10% of the populace agreeing with action against Syria. George Galloway gave a great speech in Parliament covering the points regarding the lack of evidence (which we are all aware ) as well as berating the prime minister for supporting insurgents whom eat the hearts and livers of Syrians as well as the decapitation of Christian priests by "sawing" off there heads with a bread knife!!! Rarely does British parliament resonate with such passion not to mention George shaming this government (and the last) for its support of Israel using chemical means on Palestinian people! It was an impassioned tour de force, we as a nation are expected to back intervention in Syria yet do nothing about Bahrain, Iraq et al! (Let's not forget Fallujah) I think the good news here is that people are no longer as easily fooled due to the blatant lies from the Iraq invasion and more importantly alternative media outlets and blogs such as this and others that offer a more truthful insight to what's actually going on! Tony Blair's arrogance knows no bounds and since his tenure has become a very wealthy man in the process! He actually made his impassioned plea to attack Syria from a luxurious yacht in the Mediterranean sea! Surely as " peace envoy" he should of pulled anchor and set sail east with a Lawrence of Arabia cry of "Damascus"?? Thank you doctor pieczenik for once again an insightful commentary on this serious issue

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. Pieczenick I think you've got Obama all wrong. Please put on your psychiatrist's hat and do a simple "psychological profile" of him as you might do if asked by an intel officer...

      I will do it for you.

      PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE OF BARAK H. OBAMA

      Barak Obama is a compulisive "people pleaser" who's primary motivation in any situation is to fit in and comport himself to the expectations of whatever group he finds himself in.

      As a child he was seared by the trauma of being rejected by his mother [his only parent] when she re-married a man who didn't want Barak around. Since that event Barak Obama has expressed an over-arching motivation to for acceptance. This core need over-rides all other considerations and explains all his behaviors.

      Therefore....

      When he was campaigning in 2008 he said whatever his left-of-center campaign staff wanted him to say. However once he became President he found himself surrounded by national security bureaucrats with entirely different wishes. In order to fit in with them and please them he adopted their doctrines and ideologies.

      Barak Obama will always do what the people he needs acceptance from need him to do.

      In the last case he delayed the military action in Syria for weeks so as not to displease his peers who would find executive fiat to accomplish such without Congressional consent to be a dissappointment.

      Delete
    2. And by the way..

      Regarding Malcolm X...

      "Malcolm X" is a person who's reputation is completely different from the reality. He has been romantacized to an absurd extreme.

      "Malcolm X" was a criminal and opportunist who advocated race hatred towards all whites and advocated for race war worldwide.

      In particular he called for terrorisim and violence of all kinds against whites living in Africa by all Africans. He also praised the most extremely violent African leaders for their killings of whites as well as their slaughter of other blacks and the plunder of the wealth of their countries.

      "Malcolm X" was nothing more than a criminal, a gangster, and a thing [not a man of any kind] who was killed by rival criminals.

      History often mis-labels zealous revolutionaries as criminals and criminals as zealous revolutionaries depending not on the objsective facts but on what others' want the public to think.

      "Malcolm X" wasn't a revolutionary but a simple criminal pretending to be a revolutionary in the mold of Robert Mugabe and the like....

      Africa is full of such people.

      Stokley Carmichael in the last years of his life moved to Guinea and sang the praises of that country's most vicious despot, the blood-thirsty Lansanah Conteh. According to Carmichael Mr. Conteh was a wonderful African leader.

      When are people going to wake up and realize that the negro race hasn't produced even one sincere leader of any kind?

      And that applies to the "Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King" [son of "Daddy King'].


      Delete
  2. Dr. Steve, why not a single word about the Saudis trying to sneak a secret oil deal to Putin in order for himto remove his support from Assad? And what about his odius threat to use chechen muslims(the same who did boston bombing) to attack the russian olympics?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In all fairness Dr p has many times highlighted the serious misgivings of Saudi Arabia and you are quite correct in labelling "odious" prince bandars" generous" offer to Russia but my thoughts are Russia will deal with any acts most efficiently! In fact history regarding such acts on Russia has taught us just how terrorism has been dealt with! What I would be aware of would be a false flag either in the UK or USA because opinion has changed regarding war mongering so therefore the game has to change to accommodate such feeling!

      Delete
  3. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/10266957/Saudis-offer-Russia-secret-oil-deal-if-it-drops-Syria.html

    The revelations come amid high tension in the Middle East, with US, British, and French warship poised for missile strikes in Syria. Iran has threatened to retaliate.
    The strategic jitters pushed Brent crude prices to a five-month high of $112 a barrel. “We are only one incident away from a serious oil spike. The market is a lot tighter than people think,” said Chris Skrebowski, editor of Petroleum Review.
    Leaked transcripts of a closed-door meeting between Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan shed an extraordinary light on the hard-nosed Realpolitik of the two sides.
    Prince Bandar, head of Saudi intelligence, allegedly confronted the Kremlin with a mix of inducements and threats in a bid to break the deadlock over Syria. “Let us examine how to put together a unified Russian-Saudi strategy on the subject of oil. The aim is to agree on the price of oil and production quantities that keep the price stable in global oil markets,” he said at the four-hour meeting with Mr Putin. They met at Mr Putin’s dacha outside Moscow three weeks ago.
    “We understand Russia’s great interest in the oil and gas in the Mediterranean from Israel to Cyprus. And we understand the importance of the Russian gas pipeline to Europe. We are not interested in competing with that. We can cooperate in this area,” he said, purporting to speak with the full backing of the US.
    The talks appear to offer an alliance between the OPEC cartel and Russia, which together produce over 40m barrels a day of oil, 45pc of global output. Such a move would alter the strategic landscape.
    The details of the talks were first leaked to the Russian press. A more detailed version has since appeared in the Lebanese newspaper As-Safir, which has Hezbollah links and is hostile to the Saudis.
    As-Safir said Prince Bandar pledged to safeguard Russia’s naval base in Syria if the Assad regime is toppled, but he also hinted at Chechen terrorist attacks on Russia’s Winter Olympics in Sochi if there is no accord. “I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us,” he allegedly said.
    Prince Bandar went on to say that Chechens operating in Syria were a pressure tool that could be switched on an off. “These groups do not scare us. We use them in the face of the Syrian regime but they will have no role in Syria’s political future.”

    ReplyDelete
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack

    Rebels and local residents in Ghouta accuse Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan of providing chemical weapons to an al-Qaida linked rebel group.

    By Dale Gavlak and Yahya Ababneh | August 29, 2013

    [...]"However, from numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, a different picture emerges. Many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the dealing gas attack.

    “My son came to me two weeks ago asking what I thought the weapons were that he had been asked to carry,” said Abu Abdel-Moneim, the father of a rebel fighting to unseat Assad, who lives in Ghouta.

    Abdel-Moneim said his son and 12 other rebels were killed inside of a tunnel used to store weapons provided by a Saudi militant, known as Abu Ayesha, who was leading a fighting battalion. The father described the weapons as having a “tube-like structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.”

    Ghouta townspeople said the rebels were using mosques and private houses to sleep while storing their weapons in tunnels.

    Abdel-Moneim said his son and the others died during the chemical weapons attack. That same day, the militant group Jabhat al-Nusra, which is linked to al-Qaida, announced that it would similarly attack civilians in the Assad regime’s heartland of Latakia on Syria’s western coast, in purported retaliation."[...]

    U.S. intelligence officials say the Obama regime doesn't have a "smoking gun" or a "slam dunk" case.

    But the above story is dynamite. A mushroom cloud hanging over the Obama administration.

    It could be the effective end to the Obama presidency.

    Please read the link below for full story.

    It could fracture the U.S. relationship with Saudi Arabia. Perhaps Dr. Pieczenik was right about Saudi Arabia and I was wrong.

    Time for regime change in Saudi Arabia.

    Question: Did the U.S. know or authorize Saudi Arabia's supplying chemical weapons to terrorist rebels?

    EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack





    ReplyDelete
  5. Postscript:

    "Dale Gavlak reporting for Mint Press News (also of the Associated Press)" -- from the above link.

    So this report isn't by a fly by night operation.

    But don't count on the Associated Press running with this story. But should it get wide circulation -- heads will roll and Obama could get impeached & convicted and removed from office -- if it is shown the Obama regime did know or authorize the chemical weapon attack.

    I think the dam is cracking and ready to burst.

    The Obama administration and its Republican collaborators have badly miscalculated.

    There is a boil on the American Republic and the People are ready to lance it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bandar was behind 9/11 recruitment and financing.

    Check out the resemblance between Obama and Malcolm X......

    Malcolm X would not commence a False Flag bigger than 9/11 to change Obama's approval rating now would he...coming soon to a US City near you...

    I say Los Angeles, or San Franscisco, which remains untouched:

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/57538

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obama's GREED will be his demise; he believes he is untouchable since the "Globalists" are running him and "have his Back" (favorite line of his-now you know it is NOT original)
      He is a whoremonger, bought and sold.

      He is about to get slammed for Treason according to Jerome Corsi...funding Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt with his "half-brother" as bagman.
      The evidence will be part of the trials in Egypt against Morsi et al.
      So Obama will have to deny his "brother" as family, and his identity should finally be exposed.
      Corsi said this is worse than Iran Contra ever was...that Morsi's guys attacked the Benghazi CIA compound - AT OBAMA'S REQUEST!!

      Delete
    2. Here are the KNOWLEDGE-WORTHY ARTICLES TO CONSIDER. Each one is a smoking gun.
      Info coming FAST & FURIOUS OBAMA - Malik SHABAZZ is no Malcolm X
      His Henchmrn & Lackeys cannot keep up.

      http://www.wnd.com/author/jcorsi/?archive=true

      Delete
  7. 2nd postscript:

    The link to the above report has gone dead. No surprise when the report, if accurate, can take down the Obama presidency and collaborator Republicans.

    Just a simple hack job when billions of dollars are at stake.

    The story is at the Land Destroyer Report (should be harder to take down link).

    Syrians in Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack

    There is a cancer in the American Republic.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sad part is 99% of Americans don't know who really controls America! Watch these Y/T videos "America Controlled By The Jesuits Of Rome" and this one "The Jesuits Control America From Georgetown University" also Google this site "Pictures of Papal Infiltration" and take a good long look at those pictures on that site also this one "ROME: A Few Photos of Their World Power" As they say all roads lead to Rome!

    ReplyDelete