Translate

Monday, March 10, 2014

always look at the passenger list,  interesting story for reposting
http://beforeitsnews.com/events/2014/03/electronic-weaponry-hiding-malaysia-plane-24-suspects-on-board-2432744.html?utm_campaign=&utm_medium=verticalresponse&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2FbTbT&utm_source=direct-b4in.info&utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse

20 comments:

  1. more here... http://my.news.yahoo.com/semiconductor-firm-top-management-onboard-missing-mas-flight-134107127.html

    and here.... http://questionmarkheadlines.blogspot.com/2014/03/mh-370-dewd.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Most interesting and most peculiar also! A plane disappeared into fresh air!?!? Already we've had the tried and tested obligatory Iranians on board as well as fake passports! I presumed you kept hold of your own passport so surely this has to be confirmed? But I'm not a seasoned traveller and prefer the green and pleasant of Britain! What's interesting is the various theories about the hi tech weaponry which may or may not exist, we've now heard of technology that makes objects virtually invisible along with Tesla ray guns, projection technologies making us think something is there now there's a dilemma do they make something that is there not there or something that's not there there?? My first thoughts are that is reject the terrorism theory as there haven't been any demands as as we readers have learned terrorism is to create panic as opposed to a singular act so where does it leave us? Apparently cell phones are still ringing and the plane was abundantly equipped with the necessary to aid location and rescue! All I do know something isn't ringing quite true once again and there are more than enough theories for us to read and discern but the fact that scientific or technological personnel were on board wouldn't be the worst place to start would it? Always look at the passenger list indeed!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. FULL VIDEO: Ed SNOWDEN
    Lambasts LIARS Keith Alexander & Michael Hayden, as the two officials to have most “harmed our internet security and actually our national security” in the era since the September 11 terrorist attacks by “elevating offensive operations” over cyber-defence.

    I do not believe he is a CIA asset. He may have worked for them at one time, but I believe he found them UNSAVORY.

    DONT OVER ANALYZE JUST LISTEN & Watch.

    It took 7 Servers to broadcast:
    http://techcrunch.com/2014/03/10/watch-edward-snowdens-sxsw-interview/

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/wp/2014/03/10/edward-snowden-theyre-setting-fire-to-the-future-of-the-internet/

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/10/edward-snowden-nsa-leaks-sxsw

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Transcript:

      http://blog.inside.com/blog/2014/3/10/edward-snowden-sxsw-full-transcription-and-video

      Delete
    2. Patriarch, it could very well be that in a narrow sense the interests of the CIA and those of we 'mere' citizens coincide. We want privacy for our personal communications. They want cover for their "fun and games". The NSA was depriving them and us of each, and so apparently with the initiative of the CIA, Snowden was assisted in his whistle-blowing. This isn't to say he's a fraud.

      See the Wayne Madsen report from last month: "Snowden was not alone: CIA faction behind leak of NSA document trove" - it's reposted here in its entirety, scroll down: http://wxxxnews.blogspot.com/2014/02/headlines-of-note-for-february-2014.html

      Delete
    3. You are not the first person who is thinking along those lines:
      "Snowden was, that is my suspicion since long, fed by cia who, for whatever reason, wanted to fuck nsa.
      The current "revelations" (which anyone with a brain wasn't surprised by) might be nsas "thank you" to cia.

      No matter whether I'm right or wrong, the world wins either way with major institutions and players of zusas system kicking each other.
      Posted by: Mr. Pragma | Mar 12, 2014 2:38:38 AM | 38"
      http://www.moonofalabama.org/2014/03/cia-brennan-to-be-fired-in-3-2-1-.html

      Looks like there is a civil TURF war of boundaries between bloated budgets. Both are supposed to be non -domestic, but have breached that.
      So it must be greed.
      Brennan is a bad man:

      http://govtslaves.info/cia-director-john-brennan-chief-suspect-in-murder-of-captain-philip-marshall/

      Delete
    4. Brennan all but confirms what Madsen's sources allege... http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/03/cia-director-john-brennan-assesses-saudi-arabia-syria-iran.html

      "Brennan also acknowledged the tensions arising from growing technological advances, which make it easier to steal secrets and harder to protect clandestine officers and operations. How to ensure US national security while also safeguarding Americans’ 'liberty, freedom and privacy' are the sort of 'challenges and questions that truly hurt my head,' he said."

      -just insert "CIA above-the-law fun and games" for "liberty, freedom and privacy" and then it makes complete sense.

      Delete
    5. Another sceptic of SNOWDEN's alibi:
      http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/11/is-edward-snowden-lying/

      Delete
  4. "I have grave concerns that the CIA's search may well have violated the separation of powers principles embodied by the United States Constitution, including the speech and debate clause," she said. "It may have undermined the Constitutional framework essential to effective congressional oversight of intelligence activity or any other government function."

    The POT calling the KETTLE BLACK!
    Transcript:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/transcript-sen-dianne-feinstein-says-cia-searched-intelligence-committee-computers/2014/03/11/200dc9ac-a928-11e3-8599-ce7295b6851c_story.html?hpid=z1

    http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/cia-senate-snooping/feinstein-hints-cia-search-may-have-violated-laws-n49831

    http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/cia-senate-snooping/cia-director-denies-spying-senate-intel-committee-n49916

    http://www.cfr.org/intelligence/conversation-john-o-brennan/p32553

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.nationaljournal.com/white-house/what-else-can-the-obama-administration-do-to-undermine-u-s-security-20140311

      Delete
    2. Wow, Sen. Feinstein has an epiphany...better late than never.

      Delete
    3. Now she wonders about her Constitutional rights. The irony.

      Delete
  5. Hmmm let's see, which ones of those pesky rights are important Ms Feinstein? I guess it depends on the situation. I can't help myself to coin a phrase of Dr P's when talking about a certain New Jersey politician.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Separation of powers"? Does that really exist anymore since the advent of "the patriot act"? I mean it sounds good in principle. Maybe if she complains loud enough she will be dragged kicking and screaming off to Guantanamo by Homeland Security yelling "I have my rights!" Respect my authoritay! ; )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then to read about John Brennan's explanation and denials regarding the whole thing culminating in him essentially calls Feinstein nuts is just classic. Reminds me of a childhood cartoon i used to watch where a certain puddy tat has to explain to granny how he doesn't want to eat tweedy bird. Its comedic.. If Brennan can convince me he is sorry he should get an academy award.

      Delete
  7. Move over Matthew McConaughey here comes actor John Brennan for best actor in the sitcom category.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Now Nancy Pelosi has stepped up to the plate to agree with Seen. Feinstein and lend moral support, gee I hope Nancy didn't miss her manicure appointment to do so, cuz all this Constitutional stuff could really cramp a politicians style if they let it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people putting us on, or imbeciles who really mean it"…
    Mark Twain.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Now Jim Sensenbrenner the author of the Patriot Act is now "shocked to hear about Sen. Feinstein's allegations of the CIA secretly searching computers". And he is "shocked that the Justice Dept. would use intimidation against Congressional Staff". Wake up Jim and smell the coffee.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Gee if Jim really gets himself worked up, he may even become "dismayed", making him "shocked and dismayed". Then you better watch out ! No telling what Jim is capable of then.

    ReplyDelete