Saturday, December 28, 2013

Here is some background for tonight's post….computer troubles (hmm) so it might be late.


  1. We shall wait with baited breath! But first off merry Xmas and a happy new year Dr pieczenik I'm sure I'm not alone in recognizing your contributions along with your fellow contributers whom I also extend good wishes and shall enjoy the privilege of reading and sharing information ect so from me and I'm sure many other readers from "across" the pond a very happy new year and long may
    We continue to with what I find enlightening and educational! So god bless

  2. Also a happy New Year ahead Dr. Steve. Personally I can't believe a damn thing said about Adam Lanza. Does or did he actually exist. He seems nonexistent for at least a few years before the event. A real hoodwink this Sandy Hook.

  3. A happy new year?
    I doubt any happiness will result until obama is thrown in jail:

    Purging Senior Military Officers/NCOs..........Martial Law in the not distant future---Sounds feasible to me

    Posted by Harry Riley on December 13, 2013

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: Col Jack
    Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 5:28 PM
    Subject: Insight into why Obama seems to be purging the military .


    When I asked my colleague the Army Colonel why he thinks Obama is doing this, the reply I received from this lifelong soldier and Army leader shocked me.

    Paraphrasing him, this is what he told me in a nutshell.

    One of the big new battle scenarios being actively discussed in the military recently is how to handle civil unrest in the U.S. and fighting in the streets. What will the Army do if called in to fight armed civilians in the streets of the United States? How will that urban warfare be conducted? Will troops be able to fire upon other American citizens when the troops take an oath to protect American citizens?
    The Obama Administration may not care if getting health care becomes more difficult and more expensive because it is all leading toward civil unrest. It is believed by some that Obamacare will only get worse and worse, and then in 2 to 3 years when people have a very difficult time getting medical treatment for themselves or their loved ones, people will get enraged.

    By the way, you should know that my colleague, the Army Colonel who is telling me all this, is Black. He specifically commented, and outwardly expressed his embarrassment, about how Blacks have become so dependent and enslaved by the welfare system and the Democrats that it would be very easy to create civil unrest and race wars merely by cutting off, or dramatically hindering, EBT payments for only a month or so. He believes that most Blacks, who have a misguided sense of entitlement, will then take to looting stores and rioting.

    1. Once the race wars, civil unrest, and violence becomes pervasive throughout the U.S., Obama will declare martial law and take over. Elections can, and will, be postponed under martial law.
      My colleague noted that this possibility is clearly being analyzed and discussed inside the military because such a martial law strategy is nothing new. Tyrannical and dictatorial leaders in the past have done the martial law strategy many times. He noted that dictators such as Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler did basically the identical thing.

      He went on to say that one of the most recent examples of this strategy was when Marcos declared martial law in the Philippines from 1972-1981 due to civil unrest. The Philippines had democratic elections up until that time.

      When martial law was declared, the Philippine constitution was suspended, its Congress dissolved, all elections were suspended, and Marcos remained in power for years beyond his elected term. The alleged “terrorist bombings” that occurred in the Philippines, which lead to Marcos declaring martial law, have always been questioned and never proven to be the acts of actual terrorists.

      He concluded by saying that many believe this is the real reason behind the purgings of military generals. The older members of the military, and especially its generals and leaders, tend to be more conservative and they believe in the Constitution—and following the Constitution.

      Thus, a tyrant and dictator needs to get rid of these military leaders before a state of martial law is declared if the rising dictator wants the military to follow along and do what the dictator says. Due to the loss of many experienced military leaders the past few years, the military is now being run and guided more and more by younger, inexperienced leaders. The type who won’t really know what to do if martial law was declared. Moreover, he noted that there is a growing mind set throughout the military now that every soldier needs to keep quiet and just follow along with what Obama says and wants to do or you will be fired and your military career ruined. Again, I was told this is nothing new since removing strong military leaders in advance of declaring martial law is a historically-proven element of a rising tyrant and dictator.”


    2. Correction link:

  4. John Brennan is alive & well, but TOM Clancy expired mysteriously, who is responsible?

    CONNECT THE DOTS- breitbart Hastings , Clancy all writers with something to disclose.
    TOM is memorializing him on their end of year in memoriam.



    Obama is merely the figurehead of tyranny. He is being paid in GRAFT FOR HIS EVIL.

    1. Correction: TCM. MY VISION IS FAILING.


  6. Patriarch's scenario is frightening. If the government is preparing for a civil war, it's one reason why they'd want to come for the guns in advance of that.

    Alex Jones is still silent. Nothing to talk about, I guess.

    The Hartford Courant said this:

    Sandy Hook Report Timing Was Late And Lame

    The Hartford Courant
    6:04 p.m. EST, December 27, 2013
    It's mystifying why it took so long for the state police to finally release their report on the investigation of the most infamous crime in Connecticut history.

    The disturbed Adam Lanza's attack on Sandy Hook Elementary School — a shooting spree that took the lives of 20 first-graders and six women at the school — occurred more than a year ago, on Dec. 14, 2012. The state police report on the shootings was first promised by authorities in June, then again in September, yet both deadlines were missed.

    But here it came Friday afternoon, a massive, hard-to-access, 7,000-page file put up on a Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection website. Its release in that way and at that time was another example of the department's poor timing.

    Released on slow-news-day Friday in the middle of a holiday period, it almost seemed as if the department was trying to diminish public scrutiny of the report. The Christmas/New Year's period is also not a great time for the families of the victims to relive the horrific event and try to digest the massive report.
    The crime was as simple as it was terrible. The lone perpetrator is dead, the only mystery remaining his motive.

    1. One comment to the editorial:

      Bill Albrecht · Top Commenter · UConn
      I am a numbers kind of guy. What would interest me at this point is how much of the SEVEN THOUSAND pages, according to this editorial will be redacted. BTW such a nice word for blacked out, hidden, etc. Of the pages I have seen I have little doubt that it will leave more questions unanswered than it will satisfy the media and public at large. Also in question will now be perhaps the battle by the CSP to keep those 911 calls that were routed to them secret like Sednesky tried to do with the Newtown calls. And then the question of has the Town Clerk of Newtown finally complied with FOI and state law and released copies of the death certificates? And some people still wonder why there are more questions than answers.
      Reply · 3 · · December 27 at 7:43pm