See the all-new STEVE PIECZENIK TALKS at StevePieczenik.com
What's the mystery? He's another Illinois politician/lawyer doing things the way they're always done there. No one wants to lay a hand on him despite his perjury and obstruction of justice. He's just a scumbag like his boss.
Attorney General Eric Holder is being controlled by THE C.I.A. (created and controlled by SKULL AND BONES)! In addition, illegitimate Obama is a complete and total creation of THE C.I.A. (controlled by SKULL AND BONES)! Therefore, THE BUSH FAMILY and THE CLINTONS control illegitimate Obama for the CITY OF LONDON, England that reports to THE JESUIT ORDER!
The thing that amazes me the most is the 99% of people globally don't realize that all Central Banks in the world except 3 countries now are controlled by the Vatican bankers Rothschild family who report directly to the Jesuit Superior General who controls every aspect of our daily lives thru •The Vatican and The Jesuits!http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/Vatican/esp_vatican37.htm
TO Dr. Steve Pieczenik M.D. Ph.D.:The C.I.A., the N.S.A., and YOU TUBE are intentionally modifying my YOU TUBE CHANNEL and google+! Currently, my YOU TUBE CHANNEL shows NO COMMENTS attached to any YOU TUBE VIDEOS; however, I have been posting comments for several months! Now, I can not immediately access my google+ account from my YOU TUBE CHANNEL; and when I do access my google+ account, the newest comments do NOT SHOW (last comment June 19, 2014)! Therefore, THE C.I.A. is probably running a double YOU TUBE CHANNEL or FAKE YOU TUBE CHANNELS! I have recently (June 26, 2014) posted comments at Sen Ted Cruz YOU TUBE CHANNEL discussing YOU TUBE VIDEOS showing evidence that THE C.I.A. and Al Qaeda (controlled by THE C.I.A. and other agencies) will most likely "NUKE" THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL during THE FALL of 2014!
"CLICK" my name above to get to my google+ account and current YOU TUBE comments recently posted at Sen Ted Cruz YOU TUBE CHANNEL (June 26, 2014)! These said comments discuss various YOU TUBE VIDEOS showing evidence that THE C.I.A. (created and controlled by SKULL AND BONES) and Al Qaeda (controlled by THE C.I.A.) will most likely "NUKE" THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL during THE FALL of 2014!
What will be the yeild of the "nuke?"Will it use a plutonium core or a uranium core, and if so which isotope of uranium?Will it be an implosion device? If so what will be the mass or weight of the fissile materials used?Will it be a thermonuclear device? How will it be shielded, and with what kinds of alloys? Will it use any isotopes of hydrogen or other gases?Where will they obtain the fissile materials, shielding metals and explosives?What kind of triggers will the device have? Where will they obtain them and who manufactured them? Will they use krytons?Please respond Raymond as I am eagerly waiting on the specifics of this fiendish plot!!
Dr. Pieczenik, could you comment on the continuation of MK Ultra programs *after* the Church hearings in 1975? It has always struck me as incredibly improbable that such a strong line of interest would've been discontinued due to public revulsion. Were you ever involved in or privy to such continued research, given your high level security clearance, et al?
MK Ultra was a cluster of research programs which ended long before the Church hearings because they learned all they needed to know by that time.Thereafter small groups used some of the methods developed, but not within the framework of the CIA.All the program records were destroyed and no one in CIA was given the final methods.All the methods were given to outside operators.The Sirhan Sirhan matter is one example. But in the last fifteen years you haven't seen a trace of CIA using any of these methods because the people who had them wanted them to themselves and didn't trust CIA to possess them.It's all private.
Eric HOLDER's CorruptionBACKSTORY not revealed by David Gregory on Sunday's MEET THE PRESS:Disturbingly, evidence has surfaced that the President Obama’s close friend and senior advisor violated her oath “to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” the rules of legal ethics, not to mention the law. As a senior member of the Enron Task Force, Ms. Ruemmler prosecuted four Merrill Lynch executives and sent them to prison on an indictment that was “fatally flawed.” The conduct the prosecutors alleged was not criminal. At the same time, she deliberately hid exculpatory evidence—that is, evidence she was constitutionally compelled to hand over to the defense. Indeed, the prosecutors not only acknowledge the evidence as exculpatory, they yellow-highlighted it as such—then buried it. While still denying there was any Brady ( exculpatory) evidence, the Federal prosecutors in the Dallas Merill Lynch case mailed to defense attorney, Sidney Powell, a disc of documents they did not realize revealed crucial notes of government agents’ interviews of the person that lead prosecutor Kathryn Ruemmler herself had called the “key” to their case. Not only did these long-hidden notes reveal clear, declaratory statements that directly contradicted everything Ruemmler, Friedrich, Hemann and their hearsay-only witnesses had told the court and jury, but the prosecutors had actually yellow-highlighted the notes as Brady information favorable to the defense—and still hid it. Not only did Ms. Ruemmler hide the evidence she had identified as crucial to the defense, but she signed the false and misleading “disclosure letter” to defense counsel. Ms. Ruemmler then elicited hearsay testimony from witnesses that was directly contradicted by the first-hand evidence she and her Task Force hid. She capitalized on and compounded the injustice, repeatedly telling the court and jury “facts” that were directly refuted by the evidence she hid. Not only did Ms. Ruemmler hide the evidence she had identified as crucial to the defense, but she signed the false and misleading “disclosure letter” to defense counsel. Ms. Ruemmler then elicited hearsay testimony from witnesses that was directly contradicted by the first-hand evidence she and her Task Force hid. She capitalized on and compounded the injustice, repeatedly telling the court and jury “facts” that were directly refuted by the evidence she hid. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ultimately reversed 12 out of 14 counts of conviction against the executives, acquitting one entirely. All the defendants were released, after having spent up to a year in prison on a sham indictment, while Ms. Ruemmler and her cronies continued both to hide the evidence that defeated the government’s case and to demand that the Merrill executives be prosecuted a second time on the same indictment. Kathryn Ruemmler, who signed the Brady letter in the Merrill Lynch prosecution, which omitted the crucial yellow-highlighted statements of the person she herself said was the “key” to the prosecution, was promoted to Assistant Attorney General, and then became Obama’s longest serving chief White House Counsel. She recently returned to the prestigious firm of Latham & Watkins. http://observer.com/2014/06/all-the-presidents-muses-obama-and-prosecutorial-misconduct/http://observer.com/2014/06/longtime-federal-attorney-eric-holder-protects-corrupt-prosecutors/
As a result, a bill was sent to the Senate for consideration: ...The Department of Justice opposed the "Fairness in Disclosure of Evidence Act."http://www.constitutionproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/callforcriminaldiscoveryreform.pdfThe bill died. And the Department of Justice continues to hide evidence. Holder’s view: Only prosecutors can decide what is “material to the defense,” and if they decide it’s not material, they don’t disclose it—even if it is obviously favorable to the defense. Mr. Holder’s Department is even seeking to change the ethical rules in each state to comport with the Department’s view and make it easier for prosecutors to hide evidence. Mr. Holder’s view of the Brady rule puts the prosecutor in total and sole control of the outcome of the case. It licenses him to lie. Attorney General Robert H. Jackson; “The prosecutor has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America. His discretion is tremendous. . . .While the prosecutor at his best is one of the most beneficent forces in our society, when he acts from malice or other base motives, he is one of the worst.” A prosecutor has almost unilateral, unchecked ability to destroy the lives of those he charges. It is beyond troubling that our top law enforcement officer chooses the company of those who repeatedly failed their duty.