Translate

Saturday, November 10, 2012




THE THIRD SOFT MILITARY COUP
General Petraeus, DCI, Sacked From CIA for Extramarital Affair: Why now? Why so precipitously?  
What Does This Have To Do With The Cover-up On Benghazi
Please excuse the following literary introductions to the aforementioned question? It’s important to understand the past history of the answer to Petraeus sudden dismissal and the obfuscation surrounding the Benghazi Affair.  
Dear readers think of two books written fifty years ago—Advice & Consent [1962] and Seven Days In May [1964].
 Oh by the way, please add two more books, entitled,  Maximum Vigilance and  State Of Emergency written by yours truly, Dr Steve Pieczenik, almost twenty years ago.-
What do these four books have in common? 
  They all refer to an impending military coup against a weak or corrupt President at a time when POTUS appears to be politically most vulnerable—before an election or during a treaty negotiations when major concessions are being made. 
  I would like to summarize my point about Petraeus and Bengazhi as the “Third Soft Military Coup.”
What do I mean by a ‘soft coup’?
A ‘soft coup’ is an attempt by the US military and  other organizations within the US government to change the present POTUS without any appearance of tanks, military personnel in the streets of America, or imposition of dictatorial powers that would inform the American public that in fact there had been a change of the “democratic’ nature of the republic.
Please remember, my dear readers, that a republic simply means a nation-state with representation by elected intermediaries like legislators, etc.  You must recall that a republic suis generis is not by nature a democracy. 
  So why is this concept of the maintaining the integrity of the republic so important?
Every military, intelligence and other government leader pledges allegiance to the constitution and the Republic –not democracy.   The notion of democracy is simply implied in the Constitution and inferred by the electorates.
  So what happens when an elected President is no longer convenient for whatever reason? 
  Take the case of JFK, dissipate, indecisive, pot-smoking,  LSD –tripping President who threatened the perceived military strategy of ‘strategic force’ so the CIA, the military and other organizations conveniently assassinate him.  A conspiracy?  Not really!  It’s a fact that many of you can read about in several books. 
  This particular assassination I knew personally about because one of my operatives, Cord Meyer,  a brilliant disillusioned CIA operative had his ex-wife Mary Pinchot, the  free-spirit who introduced JFK to Pot, LSD and Peace Movements, murdered on jogging path in Georgetown.  Yup, his own wife.
  But let’s not dwell on the details of whether I am right or wrong.
  The next U.S. coup was another ‘soft coup’ in which I was a witness.   That was the one that we talked about when CIA operatives called the “Watergate Burglars’ were caught and then Nixon was forced to resign as a result of this amateurish CIA prank.  Thanks to Jeb Magruder [CIA], John Dean [CIA recruit at Georgetown University--- a center of CIA recruiting], and Alexander Haig [military Intelligence] and Bob Woodward [CIA-Naval Intelligence], there was a ‘bloodless coup’ in which John Schlesinger,  DCI and the Sec Def as well as Sec State State took over control of the government without the ‘spilling of blood and guts’. 
I was there! So let’s not get into conspiracy ‘babble’.
  Twenty years later I was asked to work on the Bush Jr campaign.  Unfortunately I helped out because I was quite loyal to Bush Sr and the fact that he turned out to be a disaster was my belief that he would be ‘controlled by his father’ . But I was wrong!
  By the way, I do mistakes! Quite a few as it turns out! But hopefully I would have learned from my mistakes.  
But let me continue with the point about ‘soft coups’ and how I personally know about them and how I had participated in them. 

Dear reader, believe me all of this prelude will lead up to the point I am about to make about General Petraeus sudden dismissal along with the dismissal of AFRICOM Commander General Carter Ham and Rear Admiral Admiral Charles M. Gaouette from the command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three [CSG-3].
All three were dismissed suddenly because the White House feared correctly that there would be potential military coup against  President Obama ---making this the Third Military Coup in recent American History.  
Anyway back to Bush Jr and his vitriolic administration that eventually eviscerated our brave military warriors and their capacity to fight future wars.
  The simple story of my involvement was that I worked behind the scenes to ‘denude’ POTUS and rid DOD of Rumsfeld and Cheney.  We were able to get rid of Rumsfeld.   A very brave American hero took his place in Robert Gates (Bush Sr long time operative).   Cheney’s right hand man---Scooter Libby was imprisoned and Cheney could no longer trust our DOD so he created the ‘killer for hire’ through his contact with the sister’s brother, ex-failed SEAL Team member who had just created Blackwater.   That’s how mercenaries began to substitute for our brave soldiers who were making a fraction of the pay of these ‘killers for hire’.  These mercenaries had the best equipment and the best health care that money could buy.  
The basic point: I was asked by a friend and ex-Special Forces Commander,  who represented a senior official within the Bush Jr administration why I should not be brought up for ‘treason’—working against POTUS in order to overthrow him in ‘soft coup’? 
My answer -”If a President is a tyrant, then my act of treason is an act of patriotism.”   I told him that I had been insubordinate in throwing out President Jimmy Carter in order to save five hundred hostages.  So I have no problem going to Federal Court pleading guilty as long as I could swear to the lies of Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld  in the 9/11 “stand-down’  and their murder of thousands of innocent Americans. 
All discussion immediately ceased concerning my ‘act of treason’.   I continue to pursue the truth concerning neocon killers who must be brought to justice.

Finally, we get down to this issue of the sudden dismissal of CIA Director David Petraeus….
As most of you know,  I have been a great admirer of General Petraeus for well over ten years since he was a Major General in the Army and showed incredible initiative and aggressiveness in Iraq and then in Afghanistan.  Whatever he did or not do concerning his personal affairs is not really relevant to me ---nor should it be to you.
And this is why!
  The timing of Petraeus’s sudden revelation of an affair with a ‘journalist’ who happened to have been a West Point Graduate and an ‘intelligence’ Analyst but also a ‘biographer’ makes this issue a key point of the concept of soft coup.
  Normally a DCI does not resign over extra-marital affairs in general and in particular, especially when it involves a potential cover-up over what really happened in a covert CIA led operation in Benghazi.
  Remember what I told you in the previous blogs that Benghazi was a strictly CIA operation involving the storage and ‘illegal‘ supply of ‘heavy weapons’ , including Soviet made MANPADS RPGs, to ‘freedom fighting rebels’ led by Abdelhakim Belhadj, the most hard-line Islamic jihadist and the Former Leader of the Al-Qaeda- linked  Libyan Islamic Fighting Group [LIFG}  and head of the Tripoli Military Council.
Lost yet!!! You should be! 
Remember what I have told you before.
  The CIA creates the problem (i.e. the monster Al-Qaeda to fight the Soviets) and then, this monster goes out of control, and the CIA goes around creating more problems—like the “Arab Spring” and then guess whom they use to control it?  CIA arms ‘freedom fighters’ against the ‘tyrants’ that they previously created—Mubarak, Qadaffi, etc. ----yes, they use the guys who supposedly killed us in 9/11  now they are the ‘new freedom fighters’. 
The CIA is a mess. Guess who does not like this mess?  You got it—the military
  Especially generals like Petraeus who tried to ‘militarize’ the completely ‘amatureish  CIA’  and we have two more military officials—General Carter Ham and Admiral Charles Gaouette.
  General Charles Ham is a distinguished combat general who requested support to defend and rescue the Ex-SEAL Team Contractors and Ambassador Christopher Stevens and others who were engaged in a fire-fight that was continuously monitored by the NSA and satellites in real time.  He was immediately relieved of his command and replaced without a moment’s hesitation or explanation by Army General David Rodriguez. That order came directly from the White House to Panetta to General Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff  [I have already written about these ‘choir boys’].
At same time but at a different location, R Admiral Charles M. Gaouette, command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three[CSG-3] consisting of the five US Navy carrier strike groups were specifically designated for projecting naval airpower ashore.
  The key point about the conflagration in Benghazi was the both Navy, Army, CIA, SEAL, Special Forces team all pre-positioned were ORDERED to STAND DOWN by the WHITE HOUSE.   In the process of that STAND DOWN, brave American soldiers and diplomats were massacred by forces that could have been ‘neutralized’ but POTUS refused to save their lives and invoke military assistance.
  Those who dared to defy POTUS (as I had done in the past), these brave military and civilian personnel were subsequently dismissed . 
Now POTUS has been placed on notice that he had covered up the massacre of a covert operation gone awry and Petraeus, Ham, Gaouette are cordoned into a corral of obedience and silence. 
But what Obama and the White House had feared the most and continue to fear is the following words of the famous DCI and Sec Def, Robert Gates, who on his parting words to both the military and the CIA  made the prescient warning [I have paraphrase it]:
 “I warn both the CIA and the military that intelligence community not become completely militarized”.
One minor final point!
From the very beginning, my dear readers, as I have said, Obama and his mother, maternal grandmother, maternal grandfather were and are all part of the famous ‘gang who could not shoot straight’---our INFAMOUS CIA!!! 
Please don’t forget that in the Watergate episode the FBI was monitoring CIA activities and vice versa. 
Who discovered the DCI emails in the Petraeus affair?  The FBI!!!  Yet when it came to 9/11 stand down at WTC,  they could not find a trace of anything other than ‘burnt Saudi Passports’ and personally helped the bin Laden family members to escape by the only flight allowed out of  the USA.
  Nice work, FBI Director Robert Mueller, ex-Marine Corps Officer ---You really have gotten away with murder.  Remember you were appointed FBI Director only one week before September 11, 2001.
Bob, really between you and me,  don’t you find it morally reprehensible that you ‘investigated’ Manuel Noreiga  for ‘his crimes’ under Bush Sr and then Bush Jr appoints you FBI head….hmmm. 
I think it’s time for you, Robert Mueller,  to resign as well. 
That’s the least you can do for our country!! Don’t try to play the kabuki of ‘investigation’.  Just stop the wanton murder under your leadership at the FBI.
To our brave men and women in the military:

Never but never Stand Down !!!   
   

44 comments:

  1. Dr. Steve,

    I must say the Petraeus blog was solid. I have been waiting ever since the news broke for you to post a blog on the topic. I'm not sure how you actually take correspondence so I left this message on your Facebook and figured it couldn't hurt to try on here as well. Dr. Steve I'm sure you are a very busy individual but I do a podcast called CFR(Council on Freedom Relations) Radio. www.shockthink.info Kind of spoof on the name from the actual CFR. Anyway to the point I would really like to have you on for an interview. What you have to say is very important to the American people and for some people hearing an interview rather than a blog can help digest the information. I know I'm not a huge radio show like Alex Jones but I would be honored to have the chance to have you on and explore different topics. We have an episode we are working on breaking down PSYOPS but what a better way to do that than to have Mr. PSYOP himself. I appreciate your time and consideration and wait for a response.

    Respectfully yours,
    John Scott

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John-
      Thanks for your kind words and your faithful readership.....I appreciate the invitation but must respectfully decline at this time....but I "never say never"....I will grab a listen to your radio show when I have a chance. Keep me posted.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ambassadors are considered "dispensable" by SEC State and others....please read my other blogs on ambassadors who were killed.

      Delete
    2. Steve,

      I understand that ambassadors are dispensable as are presidents, but why would Obama want this to happen on the eve of an election where it could only hurt him politically? Only his political enemies would have wanted this, and that would be the neocons around Romney and the neocon faction in the CIA. If the order to stand down came from the White House, I can't believe it came from Obama. It must have come from the "choir boys" without Obama's knowledge, don't you think? That is where I fundamentally question your analysis. Please respond to this point.

      Delete
    3. "If you want the truth on this, we published (Mirrored) NSA whistleblower Jim Stone (at Jim's request) the other week ... all credit to Jim for that intel) ... But if you want to know REAL TRUTH ON THE WHOLE THING, we think Tom Hennegan Nailed it ... Which is why we went straight to page with his intel just the other day ... You see, privately, we mentioned only one person on the planet (hint; think commodities, and do note the SWISS put their army on ALERT) ... Can launder the sums talked about ... "

      The missing hyperlinks in the above quote:

      http://www.occupythebanks.com/2012/09/mirror-jim-stone-nsa-whistleblower-anon.html

      http://www.occupythebanks.com/2012/10/wanta-reagan-mitterrand-its-here-imf.html

      The White Rabbit! ... No joke! lol
      Follow on twitter: @censorednewsnow :)

      Delete
  4. once again another eye opening insight to what happens behind the scenes! but after digesting your earlier posts this shouldnt come as a shock, being an avid reader of your blog its clear you have high regard for gen petraeus i.e. he can carry out his duties effectively so when i read about his resignation alarm bells rang that something does not add up! jumped before pushed comes to mind, over an affair!! its obvious something is afoot when i read about carter ham being relieved of his post, now im not clever enough to express properly what i think in eloquent terms but as we say in england there is a rabbit off here and i urge people to look at this and demand answers especially when soldiers are killed needlessly i.e benghazi ect, who really is in charge and for what agenda? the lunatics have taken over the asylum! as a side issue dr pieczenik it was interesting to hear my prime ministers comments regarding dr assad and the offer of being exiled somewhere! ties in with what you explained about rights of kings

    ReplyDelete
  5. please remember that Assad was trained in England and works closely with British Intelligence. Thanks for reading! I love Lewis Carroll.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm still pondering here - my guess is that Petraeus and the other two generals may have initially wanted to respond to the Benghazi attack but were shut down by the "Choir Boys" in the White house. They are now being scapegoated for following orders and standing down. But those orders would have come from the "choir boys" not from Obama. My question still is, is Pickering a man of integrity, is he loyal to the President or not, will his investigation reveal where the stand-down orders really came from, and will the right heads roll?

    ReplyDelete
  7. probably, he is career foreign service.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Probably?" Pickering does have a very impressive record. I love the way the Islamophobia network (the one with John Bolton that made that Islamophobe video) is bashing Pickering as an "Islamist lover" and an "Iran sympathizer". It gives me confidence in the guy. He does sound like a real Arabist. If the Pickering investigation really does result in the identification and punishment of the true perpetrators, does this mean the presidency could be asserting control over the clandestine services that was lost when Kennedy was assassinated? Or will Obama and/or Pickering get assassinated before that is allowed to happen?

    ReplyDelete
  9. My brain is now constructing scenarios involving threats on Obama's family, sudden heart attacks and the like. It is going to be fascinating watching the investigation as it proceeds from two sides - the Congressional one which is mostly Republican but is joined by the redoubtable Dennis Kucinich - one of the last real Democrats in Congress - and the Administration investigation headed by Pickering. You couldn't make up such a spellbinding novel. The Republicans think they are going to "Watergate" Obama. They think he is to blame for the stand down. Only the "Choir Boys" who did it know who is really to blame. Probably nobody in Congress knows. I just hope that the result of this two-pronged investigation will be that the real facts come out and nothing stays covered up. A real Watergate, if you please, not an operation to get rid of Obama as was done to Nixon. It could end our fifty-year national nightmare (1963 - 2013).

    ReplyDelete
  10. you're getting closer, keep creating scenarios....Pickering is extremely bright and talented.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. here's another POV on Pickering and his whitewashed report which doesn't even mention Hillary Clinton or John Brennan's youtube posted video, "The Innocence of Muslims":
      http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51881
      "Ironically, the report opens with a 1905 quote from George Santayanna: 'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'...
      ...it is vital to understand the origin and makeup of the “independent” panel. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton convened the Accountability Review Board (ARB) in the wake of the attacks, quietly appointing retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering to chair and direct the panel. His appointment unceremoniously appeared in the October 4, 2012 edition of the Federal Register.

      As noted in a previous report by this author, Thomas Pickering is an obvious choice to direct an investigation that could have any negative implications to Iran or this administration’s associations with the Muslim Brotherhood. Pickering is an advisory board member of the pro-Iranian organization known as the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), and co-chairman of the board of directors of the International Crisis Group (ICG), whose executive committee includes the infamous George Soros. Pickering is also vice-chairman of Hills & Co., global consultants founded in 1993 by CFR and Trilateral Commission member Carla Anderson Hills.

      The significance of Pickering’s appointment cannot be overstated or underestimated considering that the trail of blood from four Americans leads directly to Ansar al Sharia, a terrorist group funded by Iran. Who better to redirect or cover up the operational conspiracy that exists between Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton and that Muslim Brotherhood that exists at the core of the 9/11 attack? Pickering is the obvious choice...
      ..Perhaps Pickering and his cadre of co-conspirators would like to disclose to the American people the strange odyssey of a certain C-130 aircraft that left Croatia for Libya to provide assistance to the Americans under siege at the onset of the attack. The portal-to-portal flight time is about four hours, yet it did not officially “appear” on site for 23 hours. Perhaps it’s time to address the fact that the lie is different at every level, and for Pickering to stop being a firewall between his bosses and the truth owed to every American, and particularly to the families of those who were murdered...

      From the untouched to the absurd
      Left untouched by the Pickering panel are the intrinsically sinister machinations of Obama, Jarrett and Clinton, as they as are methodically taking us to the brink of a new war in Syria through their weapons running operations in Benghazi. The report intentionally offered only a very narrow view of the events in Benghazi, limiting their scope to the already exposed security deficiencies that were secondary to the redefined Benghazi “consulate.” Using this tactic effectively diverts attention away from the real issue and thus, the actual cause for the attack...."

      Delete
  11. I think that I, as well as a few commenters, are still a little confused on this one. Steve, when you had gone on the Alex Jones Show on September 16th, you had blamed the attack on Wolfowitz and the rest of the neocons. If the CIA was storing weapons at the consulate (and Broadwell had given a speech on 10/26 stating that there was a secret prison as well), why would Obama order a stand down? Wouldn't he want to protect the covert CIA operation of the stored weapons, or thwart an attack initiated by the neocons? Hopefully these questions or resolved soon, or any of the other commenters have something to say about this.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Still up here in Canada following along Steve. I'm a tad fuzzy on all the names but I'm along for the ride. Lots of chaos out there. Get your nutrition and good sleeps. It is going to be a long winter.
    Best to you.

    ReplyDelete
  13. finally some clarity on workings of cia,fbi and potus,we got to get the media back ,not enough people reading the truth,how their pushing general petraeus'affair just makes this whole situation stink,was romney a stooge?His comments on russia been a threat scared the life out of me,was that the intention? Did he loose on purpose?anyway thanks for clear ,concise information,the world owes you more than they know,thanks for your courage and clarity,Darren h. Ireland

    ReplyDelete
  14. oh what a tangled web the choir boys weave.

    As a Shrink, isn't it a fact that sociopaths continue their rampage of malfeasance until they are caught...the Thrill of it all?

    Here's a synopsis of all the deceptive Petraeus eventa to date:

    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50976

    Acording to PI Hagmann, it was members of the Iranian Cresent Army captured, to be used as a negotiating tool:
    "there was indeed a “kidnapping” in Benghazi, but not of Libyan militia members...seven members of the Iranian Red Crescent were grabbed on July 31, 2012. The Iranian Red Crescent members were snatched while in the vicinity of the CIA operations center in Benghazi after a mortar round was fired into the compound.... timing of their release as it directly relates to the talks between Valerie Jarrett and top Iranian officials in Qatar..."

    http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/7103#more-7103

    "I began by telling the president that there was a cancer growing on the presidency and that if the cancer was not removed the president himself would be killed by it." John Dean 1974



    ReplyDelete
  15. Time to once again put your pen to paper---only this time make it Pulitzer Prize winning non-fiction:

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57547646/shots-fired-near-white-house-after-robbery/


    http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1626.htm

    November 10, 2012

    "Obama Topples Top Coup Leader After Washington Gunbattle"

    "The Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) is reporting today that President Barack Obama has accelerated the purge of US Military officers involved in a coup against his regime by the “firing in disgrace” of former Four-Star Army General and current Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) David Petraeus [photo 2nd left] yesterday.

    According to this report, after his refusal to meet at the White House with Obama this past week, US Federal Forces loyal to the President stopped General Petraeus’ vehicle in DuPont Circle in Washington D.C. yesterday (Friday) morning whereupon a short gun battle ensued (Washington D.C. police are reporting this incident as an attempted robbery). General Petraeus was, then, apprehended, brought before Obama and forced to resign in disgrace over his supposedly admitting to an extramarital affair..."





    ReplyDelete
  16. There are currently mass resignations taking place by key people in American government, while mass arrests are occurring in both the US the UK and Australia regarding a pedophile network. I honestly believe that is what is truly occurring, and this Benghazi thing is just a smokescreen for a crack down on the compromised elements of government. It wasn't originally, but now it is.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I hope this is not just a dream. Pinch me or something!

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  19. The simple story of my involvement was that I worked behind the scenes to ‘denude’ POTUS and rid DOD of Rumsfeld and Cheney. We were able to get rid of Rumsfeld.
    --------
    You are so full of *&^! As if we don't remember how Rummy took on Pentagon! He said on 9/10/2011 that Pentagon cannot account for 2.3 Trillion $! And was going after the bloated Cold War style forces structure. In particular, he was going to replace the tanks with lighter and cheaper wheel based combat vehicles.
    If anything it was Rummy who got kicked out by the DoD fat assed bureaucrats in uniform. To suggest that he with Pentagon plotted against POTUS is cheer lunacy.

    ReplyDelete
  20. hohodrom said "You are so full of *&^! As if we don't remember how Rummy took on Pentagon! He said on 9/10/2011 that Pentagon cannot account for 2.3 Trillion $!"

    Wait a minute, hohodrum! Rumsfeld is your hero? I also remember the military stand down the next day ordered by Cheney when that alleged 757 crashed into the Pentagon after executing an impossible 330 degree descending spiral, crashing into the E ring on the opposite side from Rumsfeld's office, into an accounting office where 100+ accountants were trying to figure out what happened to that 2.3 trillion, and where pre-planted bombs had been placed which actually did the job of killing the accountants and destroying all the evidence. Rumsfeld himself was to be seen on the Pentagon lawn making sure that the objective had been accomplished and the evidence was all picked up and destroyed. The 2.3 trillion presumably now reside in the accounts of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and their financial backers.

    Maybe you didn't realize all this?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Dr. Pieczenik,
    In you interview to Alex Jones on Tuesday, November the 13th you have referred to 9/11 as "false attacks that we had”.
    So when are you planning to tell the world what really happened on that day? You, more than anybody else, should realize that we are being pushed towards a global conflict from which there is no coming back by a group of psychopaths. As I heard in the interview, the military ranks chickened out and the soft coup failed. There is no one else left but you. It is all out there already, but until a person of your statute will come out and say it in public it is all going to stay in the shadows of conspiracy. Somebody has to tie it all together for the uniformed public: 9/11, the Ground Zero, Viktor But, Granit missile that flew into Pentagon, anthrax letters, Patriot act that no congressmen read and that was prepared in advance, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Dear Dr. Pieczenik,

    I caught your interview with Alex Jones on 11/13/2012 and listened to it several times as it is packed with valuable insights and information and I lost my concentration several times due to Alex interrupting you. You were just going to say something important about what happened in London and were cut off. Would you please complete your thought? Also, are you going to present your understanding of what took place on 9/11? We really need to know the truth so that we can begin to make right the horrible results following the diabolical series of events that took place that day and that have taken place since. AlJazeera presented an excellent special titled "In My Mother's Arms," regarding the orphans that have been created in Iraq--800,000--and we did it. How are we ever going to atone for the death and destruction that we have brought about if we do not know the truth? We must begin somewhere. Please give us a shove in the right direction. I am a relatively new follower of yours. I admire you for your moral courage, dazzling intellect, depth of knowledge, and superb command of the English language. Thank you for what you do each day.

    Most cordially,

    Carol Crumlish

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is what happened unless Dr. Pieczenik has a different view.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I
      http://www.911-truth.net/11th_of_September-the_Third_Truth_NEXUS_magazine_English.pdf

      Delete
  23. To Peter Pan:

    "All the intelligence services of America and Europe… know full well that the disastrous attack ( of 9/11 ) has been planned and realized from the Mossad.. with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the Western Powers to take part… in Iraq and Afghanistan."
    ~ Former President of Italy, Francesco Cossiga.

    ReplyDelete
  24. It's deeper that, Reggie. Speaking as a Jew who thinks Zionism is a disgrace to the Jewish people, I agree that Zionism is a pernicious ideology; I would call it a Jewish heresy, and I call on the rabbis of the world to repudiate it. But Zionism is not very old. It is a reactionary racist nationalist ideology similar to Naziism - the Jewish version, in fact - born at about the same time, the end of the 19th century. The early Zionists were considered crackpots by 98% of Jewish people. But during WW I the Zionists went to the British imperialist David Lloyd George and made a deal for a "Jewish homeland" in Palestine after the Ottoman Empire fell. This served British interests. Zionism has served the interests of Anglo-American imperialism ever since. The strong influence of Israel on U.S. foreign policy is indeed great. From the standpoint of a rational imperialist such as Zbigniew Brzezinski, however, Israel is a strategic liability. Brzezinski is Obama's mentor. The distance between Obama and Netanyahu is a sign of an independent U.S. foreign policy. Romney and Bibi have been close since business school in the 70's. Zionism and Mormonism are similar conspiratorial political movements and have worked together closely for many years. The re-election of Obama was a defeat for the Zionists. We must now defend Obama against those who would "Watergate" him by pinning the Benghazi affair they orchestrated on him. Bad as Obama is, and even though his CIA pedigree goes back three generations, and even though his aggression against Libya, Syria, and Iran are war crimes on the same level as Bush in Iraq, the Benghazi operation was orchestrated by his political opponents (neocons, Zionists, Mormons) who are even worse than him, and this effort to get him ousted for something he didn't do cannot be justified. I don't think the regime changers will succeed in doing to Obama what what was done to Nixon, and I think they are beginning to realize it and resign in droves. Now we will just have to see what the Pickering and Congressional investigations turn up, and whether this will lead to the truth of what really happened on 9/11/2001.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Tony, I think you have it backwards. Saying that Zionism is a disgrace and heresy is like saying that republican movement is heresy. It became such ever since the Republicans totally forgot the founding principles. You have to look at Zionism through the prism of the Biblical Project. Idea of Zionism just got corrupted and perverted like everything else. Now people react to Zionism the same way they react to Swastika. But Swastika has nothing to do with the Nazis. Yeah, they used it as a symbol. They also used wheels on their cars and wings on their airplanes, yet we do not despise these objects just because they were used by the Nazis. The reason the Zionist movement was corrupted and perverted is because it posed a serious threat to the New World Order crowd and their plans, because it would undermine the Biblical Project.
    “….You will lend to many nations but will borrow from none.” (Deuteronomy 18:12), or this “For the LORD your God will bless you as he has promised, and you will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. You will rule over many nations but none will rule over you.” (Deuteronomy 15:5-7). Were these principles outlined in the Zionist movement or Torah? Yet following these principles banking cabal manage to take the entire planet under control. The ruling elite used Torah, Bible and Quran to control different groups of people. They used Jews to accumulate financial power in their hands and in some point they’ll flush them down the toiled as they did before.
    When Moses when on the mountain and brought back 10 commandments that was the first Bilderberg meeting. If you think I lost my mind, read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses starting with the line: “The existence of Moses as well as the veracity of the Exodus story is disputed amongst archaeologists and Egyptologists…”
    Why do you suppose Israel was created? To give land or state to the Jews? They were given an autonomy in the Far East of Russia-Jewish Autonomous Region. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast#History
    If you think so you are badly mistaken. Israel was created to try out “1984” with perpetual “terrorism” threat and to see if people would give up their freedoms for security AND to foment WW3 by using the differences the agentur of the Illuminati would stir up between Political Zionists and the leaders of the Moslem world. It worked for both goals, so the model was implemented worldwide after 9/11 and now Israel is heading straight ahead to start WW3.
    These dorks in Israel could have had the best relationship with Iran due to the large Jewish community in Iran.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm_kIPGV7b4 But this is not what they want. As I mentioned before the Zionist movement was corrupted beyond recognition and now we are staring into a prospect of WW3.
    Are Jews going to be flushed down the toilet as I said before? I think they will be. The Brown Shirts in Germany brought about a dictatorship and they were flushed down the toilet. Remember the Night of Long knives? What is the indication? The globalists’ run UN already stated its support for one world religion and you bet it wasn’t Judaism. Look at who is buying up the propaganda tools and you’ll figure it out.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/apr/26/church-of-scientology-buys-hollywood-studio
    The moral of this story is very simple-one cannot make deals with Satan. The sooner Jews will understand this simple thing the sooner they are going to stop real Holocaust.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First let's define poltical Zionism. It isn't a religion, it's a political conspiracy to take and maintain political power. The biblical, religious justifications are for the gullible. There is of course nothing wrong with the idea of Jews who are so inclined going back to their "roots" and going to live in what was once the Biblical Israel, but the idea that a Jewish state with a Jewish army should be established there IS, in my opinion a kind of Jewish heresy. It was considered a crackpot, fringe idea by 98 percent of Jews until the Holocaust, and for good reason. It is very understandable how the Jewish people bought this ideology as they were coming out of the concentration camps in 1945. But now the time is long past for them to understand that the idea of a "Jewish state" contradicts basic democratic principles and cannot be the basis for a government.

      Delete
  26. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Former President of Italy Cossiga is correct in that Israel was the mastermind of 9-11, and the purpose was the destruction of the Iraqi Ba'ath party, which was always Mossad's number one worry. The Iraqi Ba'ath was as anti-zionist and anti-semetic as German national socialism. The potential of Iraq's military strength from its vast oil revenues was Israel's single un-solvable problem. This is why Israel supported Iran during the war from 1980-1989, and has been seeking ways to take down the Ba'ath continuously. That they actually succeeded by placing enough agents of influence in a US administration to pull this off is truely amazing. It happened of course because their agents' careers had matured just at the moment when a suggestable and plyable President friendly to them came to power.

    ReplyDelete
  29. btw..

    Cossiga's knowledge of this is derived from the role that Burlesconi played in the matter. Burlesconi and Nicolo Pollari at SISMI conspired with Mossad to fabricate the "Niger letter," and many other documents pertaining to the WMD hoax. Burlesconi is a Mossad agent in the same manner as Robert Maxwell was in the UK. Burlesconi's media empire was financed through Mossad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks again for your comments......my readers are lucky to have your participation.

      Delete
  30. Nice to read your blog on this website. different experience to read this blog. i get some awesome information throw this article.valentines teddy bear

    ReplyDelete
  31. Benghazi Part I: Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider”
    "..the weapons were being sent to staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, for use by the Free Syrian Army and other ragtag terrorist groups to fight against Assad. The objective was and still is to destabilize the Assad government...So we see a body count attributed to Assad. Who’s doing the killing, Assad’s people? Maybe at times, but the Free Syrian Army and other groups are doing most of the slaughter. It’s one huge ‘false flag’ operation and the media is selling it hard. And Americans are buying it.."

    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51346

    Part II on 11-29-12 Benghazi: The Bush Crime Family
    www.canadafreepress.com

    audio:
    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cfp-radio/2012/11/29/the-hagmann-hagmann-report

    ReplyDelete
  32. Pt 2: BENGHAZI
    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/comments/51400

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "First, what was the makeup of the ‘hit teams,’ or who were the attackers? We have verified that the attackers were a combination of members of Ansar al Sharia and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), but they were operating under the flag of Ansar al Sharia. Who is Ansar al Sharia? Iranian terrorists. They are a terrorist group that receives their training by and funding from Iran. Now think about this. Carefully consider the implications here. IRAN. It’s the elephant in the room no one wants to mention or talk about."

      Ansar al Sharia is Iranian? Since when? They are not Shia, they are Sunni, they work for Saudi Arabia/Qatar/UAE, which are Anglo-American oil protectorates and always have been. They helped overthrow Gaddafi and are now being shipped to Turkey and from there to Syria along with the weapons. I cannot find a single connection between any of the groups named "Ansar al Sharia" and Iran anywhere else on the Net. This assertion that Ansar al Sharia is controlled by Iran is totally unsubstantiated in this article. This looks to me more like BS than "the elephant in the room". Show me any proof that Ansar al Sharia is Iranian. I would like to see it.

      Delete
  33. Now here is an account of the Benghazi event that adds up. http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-did-al-qaeda-target-ambassador-stevens/?singlepage=true&utm_source=buffer&buffer_share=8548e

    The only question not addressed by this excellent analysis is whether the attack was merely a matter of al Qaeda-related forces "becoming angry" that Stevens was closing off their access to the MANPADS. "Al Qaeda" is and and always has been the CIA Muslim Legion, ever since they were organized by Brzezinski and Gates to go against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. On 9/11/2001 they did yeoman service for the CIA as patsies. So now, if they killed Stevens, it was not only they who were angry about the MANPADs, it was also the CIA that controlled them. So we come back to John Brennan in the White House. It seems likely that the weapons shipments were his operation. When the political leadership sent Stevens to shut down the shipments, he had his Al Qaeda assets attack the annex and also issued the stand-down orders. The political leadership allowed it to happen like the cowards they are, probably afraid to rock the boat in the middle of an election.

    ReplyDelete
  34. http://www.opednews.com/articles/A-Chat-With-Counterterrori-by-Medea-Benjamin-121105-487.html

    ReplyDelete