Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Robert Swan Mueller III: Sixth and Current Director of the FBI- Please Answer the Following Questions for the American Public:

[1] Did you know or participate in any way in the recent Boston Bombing?
[2] Could you explain your relationship with Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick,  a former Legal Associate of yours at the once prestigious law firm Hill and Barlow
[3] Could you explain to the American public how you specifically were asked to work in the office of the U.S Attorney’s Office of the District of Massachusetts as Assistant United States Attorney investigating  and prosecuting financial fraud;  TERRORISM –which cases and how did you prosecute them--;  as well as Public Corruption;  Narcotics conspiracies;  and International Money Launderers?
[4] Is there any correlation between the fact that you served as a public servant of Massachusetts,  and in private practice in two PRESTIGIOUS  BOSTON –yes,  Boston appears again and again on your resume—Both Private Law firms: Hill and Barlow as well as Hale and Dorr –and the fact that there happened to be “A Terrorist Bombing In Boston”?  Sir, is that simply coincidence? Or is there some connection?   If so, please explain what that connection might be?
[5] During the time you had attended Princeton University did you join or were you solicited to join a Secret Society? And if so, which one did you join?  And if you did not join, why not? 
[6] At either Princeton University where you received your BA in 1966;  or New York University where in 1967 you received your M.A in International Relations;  or in 1973 at the University of Virginia where you received your JD;  did you ever join or were you ever solicited by any U.S. civilian or military intelligence organization,  specifically the CIA or Military Intelligence, to join, participate or interact with them in any form? 
If so,  please explain your relationship with both the USG Civilian and Military Intel organizations prior to your becoming FBI Director.
  When and if you were solicited,  by whom and what to join or represent a USG covert organization?  And for how long? 
Were you in any way working with the CIA in the Boston Bombing?  Or with any Chechens prior to the Boston Bombing?  If so, when and where?  And for how long?  And for what purpose?
[7] When you acted as lead prosecutor against Panamanian General Manuel Noriega, what LEGAL AUTHORITY DID YOU HAVE WITH REGARDS TO A GENERAL OF PANAMANIAN BIRTH AND RESIDENCE? 
  Please answer my question with regards to General Manuel Noriega,  because I was intimately involved in the attempts to ‘Get Him out of Panama’.   But as a US OPERATIVE DURING THE REAGAN administration,  no one was sure what LEGAL AUTHORITY we,  the USG,  had with respect to possible CRIMES COMMITTED by a PANAMANIAN GENERAL against a PANAMANIAN CITIZEN…..
[8] Who specifically asked you to prosecute General Antonio Noriega in Vice President Bush Sr ‘s office? 
  Was it his national security advisor Don Gregg
  Was it your FORMER LAW COLLEAGUE at HALE and DORR—C.BOYDEN GRAY—Legal Counsel to VP Bush Sr? 
  And if so, what grounds did Mr Gray or any other person in the office of the Vice President give you considering that General Antonio Noriega had told me PERSONALLY that he had worked for BUSH SR in INTELLIGENCE and DRUGS? 
Can you explain any possible legal conflict that you might have regarding this case and your subsequent appointment as Director of the FBI when two other very qualified candidates SPONTANEOUSLY DROPPED out of the RUNNING for FBI DIRECTOR?
  Was your appointment as FBI Director on July 5, 2001 for George Bush Jr in any way tied or related to your work for VP,  then President BUSH SR? 
  If so, please explain!
  Remember you are under the oath of office and the requirements of the office to not perjure YOURSELF IN ANY WAY.  And you cannot take the fifth!
[9] Were you or any of your representatives of the FBI involved in anyway in the 9/11 FALSE FLAG EPISODE or the ATTACK ON THE TWIN TOWERS?
  Remember ---if you lie, that means PERJURY—and that is a long sentence for a FEDERAL OFFICIAL!! As you KNOW ALL TOO WELL!!
[10] Were you in any way as FBI Director involved in the final ‘assassination’ of Osama bin Laden during President Obama’s tenure? 
If so,  how were you and/or your representatives in the FBI involved in the Osama Bin Laden raid and ‘Assassination’?
I think by now,  Mr Mueller, who received the Bronze Star,  two Navy Commendation Medals,  the Purple Heart and the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry ---understand that you,  a VIETNAM WAR HERO,  MAY HAVE TURNED YOUR LOYALTIES AWAY from SERVING OUR COUNTRY  to serving our  PRESIDENTS WHO HAVE HARMED OUR COUNTRY!
  Is that what they taught you at St. Paul’s School?
  I think not, Mr Mueller!
  I will quote to you what one of your most famous legal colleagues,  Joseph Welch,  uttered to Senator Joseph McCarthy: 
  I close my case, Mr Mueller.   And now,  as an ex-hostage negotiator and psychological warfare operative--- I leave you with your conscience and ask you again—Will you RESIGN?   For the benefit of the country that both you and I fought for?
When you ponder this question,  I would like you to remember  those fine words of inspiration and truth that were taught to you at both St Paul’s School and Princeton—
 “Let us learn those things on earth,  the knowledge of which continues in heaven!”


  1. Great piece!


    1. NOW, CALL THE PD office & send those interrogatories to the federal public defender to file a motion with the judge to request a deposition in the present Boston Massacre matter at hand. highly relevant and probative. if denied, it can be appealed to a higher court:
    USA v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
    Criminal Action # 13-MJ-02016-MBB
    Office of the Federal Public Defenders
    Miriam Conrad, Esq. William Fick, Esq, and Timothy Watkins 51 Sleeper Street 5th floor, Boston, Ma. 02210

    Here is a young woman, age 23, Alissa Kilzer's personal diary of the struggling immigrant family in Cambridge around January 2012.

    2. You should email her and invite her to join your blog: she'll rewrite her diary in no time!
    she is out of the country but here is her mother's contact information:
    Anne Kilzer
    Home (617) 932-1869
    108 Rutledge Rd
    Belmont, MA 02478-2633
    (near the Romney Mansion)

    Please phone her.

    3. Let's ALL OF US build a support team to expose the corruption and cancer in American government before we cannot.

    4. Let's commence the Revolution via electronic messaging!
    Let the TRUTHER's rise up and Conquor the FALSERS & TREASONERS!

    here is her Twitter link. i do not subsribe.
    "my mother had already spoken to the FBI when I wrote the post. What I wrote is the truth as I experienced it and I stand behind it. Since writing it I have been in touch with an extensive number of media sources, and have confirmed what facts I know verbally or over think that such deception could exist within a family and also within our city and American society. It saddens me to think that any human being would be capable of such violence against other people, American culture and a sense of world peace.."

    "During this facial session she started quoting a conspiracy theory, telling me that she thought 9/11 was purposefully created by the American government to make America hate Muslims. “It’s real,” she said, “My son knows all about it. You can read on the Internet.”

    I have to say I felt kind of scared and vulnerable when she said this, as I am distinctly American, and was lying practically naked in her living room...While Zubeidat was very good at giving facials, I can say that her increased religious zeal and offensive political suggestions about 9/11 in part influenced my decision to not return to her home since January 2012. Those details aside, she struck me as a hard-working woman who cared a lot for her family...

    When my mom called me earlier today telling me about how she had seen the picture of Dzhokar this morning and called the FBI, I couldn’t believe it. As her client for years I felt affection for Zubeidat and was very distraught to hear that her sons could have committed such horrific crimes..."

    I did all the PI work for you: now put your expertise to work and be the NEGOTIATOR WHOM ALL REVERE!


    1. Sleeper Street - how fitting!!

    2. star chamber:
      public defender profile:!782C134C-3BF4-4B93-8277-D9CC31ABEB1F

    3. Yes Dr. Pieczenik it is simply coincidence that this one-time Boston lawyer worked in the city where the bombs went off. You and I both lived there also, and that doesn't implicate us either.

      As for Noriega...

      He was prosecuted in the United States for violation of U.S. Federal statutes which were clear.

      As for the decision to target him in particular for enforcement of those statutes, or the other pretexts to which you refer...

      I have no idea and could never understand why the USG wanted him out that way. As far as I was concerned all USG policy and actions during the Reagan/Bush years was driven by lunacy.

      I always love to look at the supposed evidence of conspiracy because sometimes, rarely, it turns out to be true.

      But in this matter we are a very long way from establishing any US government involvement in the planning of the Boston attack.

  2. Thanks, Doc - have you had a chance to view this yet? (not endorsing the last two segments, but the cspan callers are great =)

    ...and now, fresh off of Kyodo -
    "Moments ago Kyodo reported that Japan's Defense Ministry said on Tuesday that "about 1,000 officers of the nation's Self-Defense Forces will participate in a U.S. drill to be held in California in June involving recapturing control of an isolated island."

    Did we mention the drill would be held in California?

    It is quite clear what said "recaptured island" is supposed to represent. It is even clearer what the US backing and sponsorship of such a drill on US soil is supposed to telegraph to China, so we won't go into any details."

  3. here is an eyewitness account from his 3rd floor window.
    doesn't appear that he was run over by his brother, but he was on the ground face down, just as i witnessed it also.


    2. Patriarch, your point about the photographer not stating he saw the SUV run over the suspect on the ground is important because you would think if the photographer did see a person being runover by the other suspect's car, he would remember that and state that observation.

      (It's not everyday that you see a person runover by a car. Although, it's possible he didn't see that very well because of the angle.)

  4. Dr. Piezenik, you are right to focus on Robert Mueller.

    Chambliss: Law enforcement agency may have had info about Boston bombing in advance

    WASHINGTON — Georgia Sen. Saxby Chambliss told Channel 2 Action News late Tuesday afternoon that a law enforcement agency may have had information in advance of the Boston bombings that wasn't properly shared.

    "There now appears that may have been some evidence that was obtained by one of the law enforcement agencies that did not get shared in a way that it could have been. If that turns out to be the case, then we have to determine whether or not that would have made a difference," Chambliss said.

    WSBTV Channel 2

    And this from the Boston Globe:

    Russia alerted US repeatedly about suspect, senators say

    WASHINGTON — Russian authorities contacted the US government with concerns about Tamerlan Tsarnaev not once but “multiple’’ times, including an alert it sent after he was first investigated by FBI agents in Boston, raising new questions about whether the FBI should have paid more attention to the suspected Boston Marathon bomber, US senators briefed on the inves­tigation said Tuesday.

    Boston Globe

    Do not forget this:

    Boston Globe tweet of 12.53 p.m.

    "BREAKING NEWS: Police will have controlled explosion on 600 block on Boylston Street

    12:53 PM - 15 Apr 13"

    Boston Globe Tweeter feed, 12:53 p.m., Eastern Daylight Saving Time

    Again, who told the Boston Globe reporter, Jeff Simon, that a "controlled explosion" would occur in the 600 block of Boylston Street?

    Two hours before the real bombs went off.

    And this:

    The head cross-country track coach at the University of Mobile – Alastair Stevenson – told Alabama’s Press-Register:

    “At the starting line this morning, they had bomb sniffing dogs and the bomb squad out there,” he said. “They kept announcing to runners not to be alarmed, that they were running a training exercise.”

    He added, “I’ve run a lot of races like this one, but I never saw bomb dogs at the starting line of any running event."

    “They kept making announcements to the participants do not worry, it’s just a training exercise,” -- Coach Ali Stevenson

    "Stevenson said he saw law enforcement spotters on the roofs at the start of the race. He’s been in plenty of marathons in Chicago, D.C., Chicago, London and other major metropolitan areas but has never seen that level of security before."

    So, there is substantial facts & evidence for supporting the idea the FBI and, specifically, Robert Mueller, was involved as suggested by Dr. Pieczenik.

    Say, hypothetically, there is nothing criminal, but just a screw-up or a MAJOR FAILURE by the authorities to stop the terrorist attack.

    That's possible because how can the FBI or police announce that, yes, we were conducting a drill and the "controlled explosion" referenced by the Boston Globe 12:53 pm tweet, was supposed to happen in the 600 block of Boylton Street, but the real terrorist bombs exploded in the exact location first, right where we, the government authorities, were going to conduct our training exercise.

    But things just didn't work as planned.

    (Or did things work out exactly as planned?)

    Obviously, that explanation would sound preposterous or incredibly incompetent or both.

    So, you see, the Feds can't go and admit about the 'drill', even if true, which now there is multiple evidences of its existence or was the announced 'drill' cover for the fore-knowledge of an actual threat.

    And, if there is something more, fore-knowledge of the planned bombing, there's evidence for that too.

    1. And according to Sen. Chambliss "a law enforcement" agency had some level of prior knowledge of the threat, what other agency would that be, besides the FBI and Mueller?

      Remember, Chambliss said: "law enforcement" agency. On the federal level that points straight at the FBI.

    2. All this fault finding is bullshit.

      Do you have any idea how many of these characters get flagged for suspicion?

      There was no reason for anyone in the FBI or anywhere else to focus on this person.

      He's just one in a sea of faces.

    3. MITmichael, it's not fault finding.

      It's evaluating facts & evidence relevant to assigning responsibility for the failure of the authorities to stop this terrorist bombing.

      It's holding responsible parties to account for their actions (or lack thereof).

      MITmichael wrote: "There was no reason for anyone in the FBI or anywhere else to focus on this person."

      That's not what Sen. Chambliss said.

      That's not what the admitted contact between the FBI and the older brother suggests and the multiple warnings of the Russians to the U. S. government about the older brother.

      That's not what the Boston Globe tweet suggests, quite the opposite, really.

      The aim of your comments seemingly is to hold no one reponsible for this failure (or worse) and back the establishment & corporate media narrative.

      Although, an advocate for a controversial position must be ready to meet a challenge and in that respect your comments are valuble to the discussion.

      Perhaps it would help your position if you actually discussed the evidence presented, but instead, as is often the case, you ignore evidence which contradicts your opinion.

      Rather you tend to offer conclusions, often sweeping, with nothing to back them up.

    4. What happened occurred in one of two ways in my opinion....

      1.He didn't present enough of a threat to act. He was just one of scores of possible threats for which there isn't enough tie-ins to consider him worth pursuing.

      In this regard he probably was under surveillance to see who he was communicating with and it didn't show he was communicating with any known terrorists so it was cut short.

      2.The FBI was letting him operate so they could try to use him later.

      It's possible that the FBI knew he was militant but wanted him around so later they could try to sting him and never got around to it.

      This is very possible.

    5. Of the "hundreds" of successful FBI prosecutions of on terrorist charges almost all have been militants with no connections to other militant who the FBI stung by posing as militants themselves.

      The FBI knows who such isolated militants are and they need such people around so they can sting them.

      In this case they didn't get around to it soon enough.

  5. Chronology of FBI & White House collusion 4-15 to 4-19-13:
    How did the director of Boston office know the 2 suspects were family?

    CIA Brennan is revising history today for propaganda consumption.
    Obama is furloughing public defenders!!

    1. Patriarch, your link doesn't come up on Google.


  6. If you like Pieczenik interviews this one is fantastic from 2009 That talks about alot of what he talked about last time on Alex Jones but more in depth.

  7. Hey I wanna know how much weight Jones has actually lost on this mineral suppliment he sells on his show?

    He claims he's lost a lot of weight on this suppliment but it doesn't look like it me.

    He looks like the same overweight chubby turd is was before.

    Is it possible he's misleading us about this product?

    Do you think he really has a garage full of storable food for his family in times of national convulsion?

    Should we really be purchasing all the gold coins and bullion he thinks we should have?

  8. And hey don't forget to buy those water filters he sells. When those Chinese troops he says are massing on the border invade us we'll need to drink water from the footprint of our horses using these wonderful straws to filter out the pathogens!

    1. MITmichael, you might have a point about the weight, but that doesn't have anything to do with this post or the evidence I provided which backs Dr. Pieczenik's questions regarding Mueller.

      (Notice I don't rely on Jones' site for my citation of information -- that's on purpose.)

      But there's not much you can say, is there, regarding a Boston Globe tweet:

      Boston Globe tweet of 12:53 p.m. April 15, 2013, the day of the bombing.

      "BREAKING NEWS: Police will have controlled explosion on 600 block on Boylston Street

      12:53 PM - 15 Apr 13"

      The tweet was made two hours before the bombs went off and the first bomb exploded exactly where the Boston Globe tweet stated the "controlled explosion" would take place.

      Grasp the nettle of that fact plus Sen. Chambliss' revelation of "law enforcement" agency prior knowledge of a threat and the multiple Russian warnings on the older brother.

      If you do that then okay I don't care how much you pile on Jones. I got my disagreements with Jones, too, but I don't use that as a distraction.

      If you don't grasp the nettle then it comes off as whining and an attempt to distract from the issues at hand.

    2. you don't have to defend your posts. MIT is an unstable blogging terrorist. He wants to blow up this website.

      he is unpatriotic.

      perhaps, he used his cell phone to blow up the Finish Line in Boston?

      here is how the NY times views the FBI nefarious behavior:

      ' it legitimate? Without the F.B.I., would the culprits commit violence on their own? Is cultivating potential terrorists the best use of the manpower designed to find the real ones? Judging by their official answers, the F.B.I. and the Justice Department are sure of themselves — too sure, perhaps.

      Carefully orchestrated sting operations usually hold up in court. Defendants invariably claim entrapment and almost always lose, because the law requires that they show no predisposition to commit the crime, even when induced by government agents. To underscore their predisposition, many suspects are “warned about the seriousness of their plots and given opportunities to back out,” said Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman. But not always, recorded conversations show. Sometimes they are coaxed to continue.

      ... Who is susceptible? Anyone who plays along with the agents, apparently....

    3. You are absolutely right in that I am unpatriotic.

      I believe the United States is a sick society with an evil government.

      I make no apologies about that.

      My point about Alex Jones is that....

      1.He damages the cause of liberty because as it's messenger he's venal, dishonest and insincere.

      2.He says so many things he knows to be untrue that he has no credibility with people like myself who listen to his program a great deal.

      3.I know many people around him for the last twenty years, since he first started on public access here in Austin, and even when he went to High School across the street from me where my mother used to teach - Anderson High on Mesa Drive - and HE'S A BRAT, BULLY AND ASSHOLE.

      He's just a really dishonest, cruel, obnoxious person who doesn't believe a damn thing he says on air!

      He's just a joker, prankster and bully.

    4. What Jones is about is....


    5. The older brother turned out to be on two terror watch lists.

      Either it is too easy to be put on a terror watch list, rendering the lists functionally useless, or there was significant information that we haven't seen yet.

      Also, when older brother was in the Caucasus he attended a program put on by an organization, which is likely a CIA front company.

      More evidence the authorities knew of the older brother. Could it be the older brother knew about and had some relations with the authorities?

      Where did he come up with the money for the fancy car and clothes and the money for the trip to the Caucasus?

      True, clothes can be obtained relatively inexpensively, if you are willing to go second-hand, and used cars are much less expensive than new cars. But you don't go to the Caucasus on a shoestring budget.

      Still, I want to get to the bottom of this and will follow the evidence where it leads.

  9. start at 83 minute mark:

  10. The Bush Lie-Bury Part I

    “When the George W. Bush Library and Policy Institute is dedicated on April 25, 2013, at Southern Methodist University (SMU) in Dallas, Texas, protestors will be there to demand the ex-president be held accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and violations of U.S. and international law."

    “I helped draft about 70 articles of impeachment against Bush, from which Congressman Dennis Kucinich selected 35 and introduced them. I later looked through those 35 and found 27 that applied to President Barack Obama, even though his own innovations in abusive behavior weren’t on the list. Bush’s lying Congress into war (not that Congress wasn’t eager to play along) is actually a standard to aspire to now. When Obama went to war in Libya, against the will of Congress, he avoided even bothering to involve the first branch of our government."

    A new report from the United Nations accuses past and current US officials of withholding details regarding which specific individuals were responsible for the nation’s policy of enhanced interrogation, known throughout the rest of the world as torture. While the illegal acts were approved at the highest level of the US government, the UN insists those responsible still must be tried for war crimes, and if convicted, imprisoned.

  11. The Bush Lie-Bury Part II
    HR 198: Repeal of the Authorization for Use of Military Force

    ‘Congress finds that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), signed into law on September 18, 2001, has been used to justify a broad and open-ended authorization for the use of military force and such an interpretation is inconsistent with the authority of Congress to declare war and make all laws for executing powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States.’

    .. unprecedented and freedom-threatening laws like the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the Patriot Act, and others are dependent on it for their self-proclaimed legality....NDAA officially declared the continental United States as a war zone. Shockingly, it gave the US military absolute power over local authorities, courts, the US Constitution and everything and everyone short of the US President. NDAA also authorized the kidnapping of US citizens, their indefinite imprisonment, enhanced interrogation and even execution, all without charge, trial, conviction or even disclosure by the government..

  12. The Bush Lie-Bury Part III

    "...In a Letter to Eric Holder, two patriotic Senators warn the American people that something sinister has happened to their federal government."

    '..Obama Administration has taken its self-declared powers to levels never seen before in American history. For the first time ever, a US President ordered the assassinations of US citizens without charge, trial or conviction...
    ...section 215, which is a public statute, has been the subject of secret legal interpretations contained in classified opinions issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance example of which alluded to in the letter that the US government is spying on its own citizens regardless of whether or not they pose a terror risk.

    ..“I want to deliver a warning this afternoon” Senate Intelligence Committee member Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) prior to the vote to extend the three Patriot Act provisions, “When the American people find out how their government has secretly interpreted the Patriot Act, they will be stunned and they will be angry.” Fellow Intelligence Committee member Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) also sent a dire warning, “Americans would be alarmed if they knew how this law is being carried out.” The major problem is that there is an ever-increasing disconnect between how the Patriot Act is worded versus how the government is interpreting it...
    Senators Wyden and Udall were able to use the process of alerting the Attorney General to possible TREASON within the federal government, to instead warn the American people... Wyden and Udall already know what’s going on, and they’re outraged and afraid. And they’re doing everything in their limited power to warn the American people that they should be outraged and afraid too.'

    Comparing Clinton & Obama, the former's EO responds to threats to national security; Obama's EO uses Martial Law without any threat present:

    Clinton EO has FEMA in charge of Martial Law, receiving periodic reports. Obama's EO appears to transfer absolute authority of Martial Law to the President himself, with 3 security agencies making recommendations & FEMA has been replaced by the President’s National Economic Council. Obama has authority over “livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources.” Clinton's only drafts America’s executive class into a forced workforce if the situation “requires” it. Obama automatically drafts ALL the nation’s executives during an emergency. Clinton's requires the government to “determine the occupations and skills critical to meeting the labor requirements” with FEMA in control; Obama drafts everyone & eliminates FEMA.

    There are 3 kinds of people: Those who MAKE things happen; Those who WATCH things happen; and Those who WONDER, "What happenned?"

    Which KIND ARE YOU?

  13. Breaking:

    My opinion of the boys has taken a turn..
    Not sure it was a set up after all.
    Am very surprised they hung around Boston for 4 days.
    Tamerlin sounds like a control freak. Doesn't appear to be the first time he was a thief.

    1. Now the Sunday cab driver speaks . The bombs were built somewhere else because they arrived with them in Malden.
      Read it here:

      Also the NEW NORMAL: the patriot act kicks in.

  14. As Robert McNamara would say...

    What are the Lessons We Can All Learn from this affair?

    Well here it goes...

    1.Wolf Blitzer needs Botox really bad! Those creases on his brow are WAY SCARY.

    2.By executing these bombings these two young dissaffected youths "crossed a red line," and this has been a "game changer" for all of us because "it's a wake-up call" for America about how we have to have a "level playing field" for our "first-responders" and "wounded warriors" so they can "set a high bar" and maybe work for a company that is "brick and mortar" so that if they offend someone there will be "no worries."


    Modern phrases are FUCKING STUPID.

    The language is so fucking moronic because people today are brainless idiots who don't know what anything is or how to describe it.

    They can't even speak there own language.

  15. Or and I forgot....

    There will not be another bombing "any time soon."

  16. And while I'm at it why is it anyone in Washington uses the word "that" instead of "the" continuously?

  17. Mueller out of the loop in myriad ways , but continued to protect the criminal presidents since 2001.
    CIA kept him at arms length.
    Now he's either had enough or is functionally obsolete.*

    (*A reduction in the usefulness or desirability of an object because of an outdated design feature, usually one that cannot be easily changed. The term is commonly used in real estate, but has a wide application.)

  18. Robert Swan Mueller is a TRAITOR, for in his official capacity as Director of the FBI he wouldn’t exclude assassinating American citizens within the United States of America. This clearly makes him a traitor, for he must know the so called legal framework Eric Holder laid out for doing so is unconstitutional.

    Read more at:

  19. Oh please with this traitor stuff...

    Treason was a crime punishable by disembowlment and dismemberment in times of old such as Elizabethan England, but we're past all that now.

    Treason isn't the horror it used to be.

    Now we have more serious crimes to worry about such as driving on a suspended license or not filing an income tax form.

    As citizens we are part of a social contract and owe our compliance to government regulations in exchange for living in this FUCKING PARADISE OF A COUNTRY!

  20. Update: 18 min mark & 27 min mark:

    Notice the few views.

  21. At the end of the day what we have in the “Conspiracy theory/ist” label is a psychological warfare weapon that has from the perspective of its creators been overwhelmingly effective. Here is a set of words that is ud to threaten, discipline and punish the intellectual class—mainly journalists and academics—who might question or otherwise refuse to tow the party line. Using the term to designate pedestrian skeptics and researchers is redundant. After all, as Orwell said, “The proles don’t count.”
    Thus, unless we forthrightly interrogate the phrase and its unfortunate history we will be prone to the same confusion and misdirection that its originators intended.

    Ortega: We did a poll here at The Daily Journalist a few weeks back, and the results indicated that 60% of people believed there was US government involvement in the Boston Marathon bombings, in addition to the events of September 11, 2001. When people suspect their own government is involved in these attacks on US soil, what comes to mind?

    Tracy: It is cause for optimism because the US government was almost without question involved in the Boston Marathon bombing and the events of September 11, 2001. Major media were also complicit in wide-scale public acceptance of the official narrative put forth concerning each incident.

    For example, with the Boston bombing the New York Times played a key role in persuading the nation’s professional class and intelligentsia that a terror drill using actors, complete with a multitude of gaffes and outright blunders, was genuine. In reality there were no severed limbs, no deaths, no injuries from shrapnel—only pyrotechnics and actors responding on cue. This is not only my view, but also that of multiple independent researchers and even former CIA officer Robert David Steele.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation is well-known for entrapping and otherwise orchestrating such events to justify its own existence. With the Boston bombing there were numerous federal, state and local agencies involved in an exercise that had been taking place in the city annually over the past few years with a similar scenario. A plan for what would become the Boston Marathon bombing was authored by Director of Boston’s Emergency Medical Services Richard Serino in 2008. Serino was tapped by President Obama in 2009 to become Deputy Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and there are photos of him directing the aftermath of the April 15, 2013 “bombing.”

    The public is being asked to believe that two Chechen immigrants expertly devised extremely sophisticated and deadly explosives with consumer fireworks, scrap metal and pressure cookers. No such refractory ordnance was found at the scene because no thorough forensic investigation ever took place. The entire affair was a photo shoot and an opportunity for federal authorities to gauge public response to a military-style lockdown in a major metropolitan region.

    With such a transparently phony event being proffered as “real” one needs to ask what the other 40% in your poll are actually thinking. One can fool some of the people some of the time, and there’s still a significant portion of the population—including those who are highly educated, who can’t imagine it’s own government could be so corrupt. This is a testament to the continued effectiveness of our educational and media apparatuses, each of which emphasize an unhistorical worldview and unquestioning deference to authority figures.

    Ortega: Modern media seems to have commercialized and sold its soul to sponsors, and media giants that profit from investments....