Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Conner Expressed Doubts on April 29, 2013- About The Decision to Take on Bush Jr vs Gore Case That Resulted in the Election of POTUS BUSH JR.
She said the following to the Chicago Tribune Editorial Board in an interview:
“Maybe the Supreme Court should have said, ‘We’re NOT GOING TO TAKE ON BUSH vs. GORE’. GOODBYE!”
But wait…. that’s not all she had to say:
“Obviously the court did reach a decision and thought it had to reach a decision,” she said, “It turned out the ELECTION AUTHORITIES IN FLORIDA HADN’T DONE A REAL GREAT JOB THERE AND KIND OF MESSED IT UP.”
Now, comes the belated punch-line:
“And PROBABLY THE SUPREME COURT ADDED TO THE PROBLEM AT THE END OF THE DAY.”
Now, let’s get this straight…..
Sandra Day O’Connor was the first woman APPOINTED to the SUPREME COURT under POTUS Reagan and Chief Justice William Rehnquist. The latter was known in the Nixon Administration as the “Moron Renchburg”.
Here is my problem, as a psychiatrist and a former Senior Official in both the Nixon and Reagan administrations and someone who knew both lawyers in the case: Baker[R] vs Christopher[D], I don’t believe that she had what I now call-- a TWELVE YEAR POST TRAUMATIC GUILT [PTG].
She can’t convince me that after twelve years she had any doubts! After she carefully monitored what happened under the disastrous POTUS Bush JR whom she purposefully allowed to ascend to the throne of inequity. ….now comes the calculated re-consideration.
Then Sandra weaseled her way through the Arizona Attorney General position, next she was elected in 1973 to the Arizona State Senate and was the FIRST WOMAN to become MAJORITY LEADER. In 1975, she was elected to the Miracopa County Superior Court and in 1979 she was elevated to the Arizona Court of Appeals. She served there until she BECAME THE SWING VOTE ON THE SUPREME COURT.
She voted with her ex-boyfriend, “Renchquest”, 93.4% of the time and with the ‘sexual harassment’ Superior Court Justice Clarence Thomas, over 80% of the time.
Clearly, I am not a lawyer, thank god! But I do know how lawyers work and I have treated countless number of women lawyers.
And guess what?
Like slimy political men operatives, women lawyers are as slimy as any man. Not more, not less. But equally DISGUSTING!!
WHY?
Like slimy political men operatives, women lawyers are as slimy as any man. Not more, not less. But equally DISGUSTING!!
WHY?
WITHOUT REMORSE!!!!
Otherwise, she could not nor would not remain POLITICALLY VIABLE ----like all the JUSTICES.
Being judge on the local or federal level has nothing to do with competency. It has to DO STRICTLY WITH POLITICAL PATRONAGE.
So why does Ms O’Connor suddenly come out TWELVE YEARS AFTER SHE HAS SEEN THE TERRIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF HER MISTAKE TO RULE IN FAVOR OF BUSH JR, she wants, like all politicians to redress the past mistakes of her tenureship before she literally dies without remorse.
NONSENSE!!!
She sold the country for a few silver coins and a pat on the rump, just like Clinton, the CIA, the US Military, and legislators and even GORE HIMSELF .
She sold the country for a few silver coins and a pat on the rump, just like Clinton, the CIA, the US Military, and legislators and even GORE HIMSELF .
As for me, I can never forget nor FORGIVE SUCH AN IGNOMINIOUS , COWARDLY , NARCISISTIC ACT that Sandra Day O’Connor had COMMITTED AGAINST THE HONORABLE CITIZENS OF THE USA.
“Meninerunt Omnia Amante.”
Lovers [Of America] Remember Everything .
Thanks Ovid.
Dr. Pieczenik, I want to recommend a book: Jeremy Scahill's "Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield." If you do find time to read it, let me know what you think. Scahill and one photographer friend spent years, as well, filming what he writes about in this book unembedded (google). The film just came out but finding someone who will mount it in a theatre is something else.
ReplyDeleteAmazon's site for the book and some reviews: http://www.amazon.com/Dirty-Wars-The-World-Battlefield/dp/156858671X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1367945531&sr=8-1&keywords=dirty+wars
Here are some Scahill interviews that may be of interest if time permits:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_fq-20h5Sw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9A5aoYeETg
An MD I knew in Cambridge told me in 1984 that Rehnquist was addicted to opiates as a result of his back issues, and was impaired as a result.
ReplyDeleteRehnquist and Sandra Day both came from Arizona of all God-forsaken places.
Rehnquist was a very mediocre lawyer and judge, to put it charitably.
Sandra Day was an exceptional person in many regards.
She's been making a lot of statements like this recently, and then denies the implcations of what she's said to seek to avoid the inevitable controversy.
But it's clear that she has a conscience and common sense in abundance.
Here she is : artfully & strategically coy, redirecting any queries to her cause célèbre du jour: literacy.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/12805
"We trust TV judges more than Supreme Court Justices.Straight-talking dispute settler Judge Judy (51%) had the highest score of all the judges on our list – including all nine Supreme Court Justices, and was closely followed by Judge Joe Brown(48%)
And the most trusted leaders in America are...Michelle Obama (53%), known for fighting childhood obesity and advocating for military families, outscored every single politician on the list, including her husband, President Barack Obama(45%). Other politicos include Colin Powell (50%) and Hillary Clinton (47%), both landing in the top half of our list."
http://m.prnewswire.com/news-releases/readers-digest-announces-100-most-trusted-people-in-america-206435821.html
Yeah that Michelle Obama and her efforts against childhood obesity are truely nobel. She should be given some kinda medal for dat shit.
Delete