Translate

Friday, August 28, 2015




Turn Out the Lights Night Watchmen!
The Intelligence Community No Longer Needs You Anymore.
So they think….
I have just recently returned from a reunion of intelligence officers who have served this country for the past forty years. Since I was trained by CIA/DARPA/Military components of our country at both Harvard Medical College and more importantly at M.I.T [DARPA/CIA funding], I wanted to show my gratitude for a career  in and out of several different administrations working in policy/intel matters. For the most part, I would have to say that the reunion was well organized and quite moving as the major speakers, including DCI John Brennan, were personable, hospitable, and informative.

For most of my professional life, people thought I was a CIA operative. This was not true yet I was quite proud to have worked with many outstanding CIA Station Chiefs, DCIs and Operatives. The names are legendary: Stanfield Turner, William Casey, Don Gregg, Jim Little, Paul Redmond, Fritz Ermath and many others. 
At this particular meeting, Brennan revealed the outline of his new reorganization chart which included the creation of new “Directors” for functional bureaus like digital media and cyber warfare. Next, a man who will remain unidentified gave a brief but excellent analysis as to why the Iran Treaty to limit nuclear weapons was sanctioned by the CIA and other members of the intelligence community. I did not have time to query him further, his basic point is that the IC had thoroughly vetted the nuclear issues from a strictly scientific perspective and found it quite realistic because of the half-life of radioactive elements lasting so long that no one could really escape or avoid detection.
Another CIA professional stood out. His name [it’s safe to reveal] is David Robarge, CIA Chief Historian. Throughout two days of meetings, he presented a very accurate and often critical historical perspective of the rise of our first civilian intelligence operations, the OSS which spawned the CIA through several presidencies. Many of his key points and insights can be read on the CIA website.
I particularly found the elan vital of these old operatives [including myself] to be convivial and often jovial and reflective. No one was really puffed-up about what he/she had done in the past. It was simply a group of us sharing different insights and faux pas that we had made at different times in our careers. Contrary to the image of Jack Ryan or Jason Bourne, most of the operatives were modest, earnest and proud of their service over thirty years. There was no discussion of kinetic wars or Hollywood-type escapades. The sobriety present among my colleagues was appreciated yet it was constantly punctuated with a sharp, incisive wit that I have often associated with CIA operatives in particular. Most of them, some married to their partners in the service, found quite meaningful lives after the CIA.
For a brief moment on the second day,  I realized why I felt I had to come to this reunion of intelligence officers, most of whom I did not know or would not know. I understood that my hegira to Langley Va, to a building which I had visited twice in my life as DAS, was a final moment of gratitude to a DCI whom I did not know—John McCone. McCone created the Center for International Studies at MIT where I had learned my psychological political tradecraft. If it had not been for visionaries like Walter Lacquer [psychoanalyst], Ruth Benedict [anthropologist], Harold Laswel [Psychopathology and Politics] and Prof. Lucian Pye, I would never have had my unique, exciting career serving five Presidents as well as DOD and others.
However, my stay did not end on a happy note, in part due to my own moment of discontent. A British journalist who claimed to be not a spy decided to lecture us on the end of HUMINT in the IC. That was a premise that was at best faulty if not completely erroneous. Making matters worse, this person started his talk by stating that one of his British ancestors had developed the “Grey Massacre” of 1777 where Colonel Grey of the British Cavaliers thought it moral and expedient to silence their flintlocks so that they would make no noise when they bayoneted and massacred American Revolutionaries in their beds. 
I found this quite offensive. In my usual brusque and intolerant way, I dismissed his handler [a former CIA operative who made a living protecting ‘action jockey’ wannabe journalists] while I reprimanded the British speaker for his inane comments. I stated that he and his countrymen were “Forlorn Hope” for recent American Intelligence/Diplomatic achievements including the regime changes in the Soviet Union and the recent economic warfare in Russia. After scolding the Brit and absorbing what I thought was enough, I left to go back to my home in the South. My home, where Americans fight every day to make an honest buck and no one cares about the CIA or what would become of its future.
I wrote this blog as a tribute to my fellow operatives who had served valiantly and quietly during the worst of times in the Cold War and the present eruptions of worldwide terrorist attacks. Yet there is one more point that I have to emphasize. Whatever happened in the attack in 9/11, which many of you know was a homegrown fiasco by Bush Jr/Cheney/Rumsfeld, the CIA really inadvertently dug it’s own grave. 

What I had finally realized when I looked back on 9/11, is that the CIA [whether collusive or incompetent] had given birth to the Director of National Intelligence who would one day relegate the CIA to the one job that they were so well qualified to do: HUMINT!  Yet for some bureaucratic misconceptions, they refused to continue their basic utility of HUMINT which came from the CIA’s very foundations after WWII. This is what they did: the collection and development of HUMAN ASSETS all over the world using psychological/ cultural determinants. However, under John Brennan, the CIA became Operational using drones to create ersatz wars all over South Asia and the Middle East. They had failed to develop the very core expertise that set them aside at MIT and other learned institutions—HUMINT!
I bid the ‘Night-Watchmen’ [CIA operatives] a fond farewell and wish them the best of luck. For they have become just another bureaucracy buried beneath the greater funded, increasingly more important, MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SERVICES, implemented by 15 other agencies. Binary numbers have replaced the basic concepts of psychological determinism. For that, Americans will pay a very heavy price. I am certain that Russia, China, Vietnam, Korea, Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia,  Japan and the EU are still using personality profiles and psyop programs to eventually co-opt our manifest destiny.
We will need new leadership to think-out-of-the-box. Perhaps, one day in the future, a “Wild Bill Donovan”, the founder of the OSS/CIA, will arise at the least likely of all places and times.


15 comments:

  1. No one, can go against own chemistry. For instance when guy see girl which is formally more educated and earning more money of course he is going to run away. Girls also cannot run,
    unless they are lesbians (those are not women). Profile means sexuality, (with addictions it is even more easy as they are tactical profiles), we see someones genetical defects by looking in to their sexual perversions.
    For instance secretary of boss in MI5, she do not have perversions, but but, we can be sure that that lady has one secret love thinking of him for 30 years. There is that one, and she have perfect perfect biography. And someone would say now she is 100% asexual and checked, lady devoted to her job only.
    I also think that capitalists should think that HUMINT is totally not important, playing with capitalists is like playing with dumb empty computer cases filled with evil spirt of addiction toward money. But i am very glad to notice how situation is developing in right direction. Seems like everything is under control.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmmm.... President Obama is related to King of England...?
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw2mkHmIKOA

      Delete
    2. I mean girls cannot also run from own chemistry.

      Delete
  2. Nice post -- as always, succint. Thanks, Dave.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Did Don Gregg wear his stripped socks which match those of G.H.W. Bush?

    Don Gregg has started wearing these socks in public appearances, and he might as well as his other wardrobe choices are always vulgar. Don Gregg was always the worst dressed officer imaginable. Cheap jackets and ties, and yellow shirts....ugh.

    As for Director Casey being a good character I beg to strongly differ. I dealt with him on several occasions supporting my Case Officer and he was extremely unimpressive. Not only was he a dullard and an ideologue, but he was brutal in the violence he unleashed in CA in Afghanistan and through the Central American Task Force [for which Dewey Clarridge received a $30,000 bonus!]

    I owe my CIA career [such as it was] to Casey as it was his return to the old figures and practices after Turner which is how I was funded and so forth. Under the prior rules people like me would not have been around. However, bringing back the old bad team from the 1950s and their discredited ideas and methods brought about horrors of unimaginable terror and bloodshed for the peoples of Nicaragua and Afghanistan. Casey and his ilk including Clarridge, Jack Devine [now a hustler] Frank Anderson and Milt Bearden, not to mention Gust Avrokotos and Michael Vickers --- these guys have not only blood on their hands but much worse ---- and all for nothing....NOTHING.

    Or...

    As the Title of the unpublished memior of Mexico City COS says....

    "I Led to Nothing"

    --- by Win Scott

    Those old turds have nothing to be proud of....and I am without question more anti-communist, anti-Chinese and anti-Russian than any of them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Or maybe it was, "It Led to Nothing."

    Anyway I think none less than CI Chief Jim Angleton seized the papers in Mexico City and I don't think any has seen them since. Scott was COS in the 1960s when my friend of San Antonio Mario Cantu was running arms to rebels in Mexico for land seizures and other revolutionary activities which were common until the 1990s in Mexico. They would be common today except all the the peasants needed to fight are now in the US as laborers. Should they be returned or self-deport their may be another revolution in Mexico.

    In the 1960s Mexico [which always tolerated communists in their mist] was infected with the progressivism which spread through the US.....the outcome was thousands of students and young Leftists in Mexico were murdered by Mexican government death squads in campaigns which would have made the Guatamalans proud!

    Just before the Olympics Mexican officers mowed down huge demonstrations in Mexico City with machine guns....killing over 400 one afternoon!

    Viva Mexico!

    Win Scott was a decent man....and he had enough. Others in that division still around like John Horton had no problem with it....

    ReplyDelete
  5. When Vietnam finally fell to the communists, along with Cambodia and Laos....

    Did the lives of any Americans suffer?

    I don't think so.

    I don't think the real effects on Americans or even Australians was negative.

    It was all an exaggeration.

    Remember that.

    Don't forget.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If I had lost a loved one in Vietnam I woulda been pissed.

      Delete
  6. "National Security" work is 99% exaggeration.

    The remedies are always worse than the disease.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If Don Gregg was the worst dressed officer the best dressed was William Buckley, who bought three suits a year from Brooks Brothers, even on his meager GS salary.

    These suits were of no use though when he was tortured into a pulp in Lebanon and then mercifully died.

    Things like that in the 1980s were tolerated by the USG...including the torture murder of DEA officer Enrique Camerena, who was tortured to death in the most sadistic and grissily manner by agents of the Mexican government....and the Mexicans are still laughing at us.

    But here's the news....

    Watch the future.

    They won't be laughing much longer.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If you see John Brennan tell him from me that for one twentieth the budget of his drone program I can kill every target on his list with knives and pistols...

    And with no bystanders killed as well.

    Let's get back to basics please.

    Technology is a disaster.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also liked to use cheese wire also....

      Delete
    2. Never a machete. That's disgusting.

      Delete
  9. Mit, he wants to blow shit up with big orange balls like Rambo, please don't deny him that, as you would be taking away his "fun and games", and saving the taxpayers billions of $$$. Which again would just make some bean counter claim that they will have to defund his "pet" program. You know how it works, gotta spend a lot of money to justify getting more money in next years budget : /

    ReplyDelete
  10. The point of Drones is that it makes murder more clinical and you can use bullshit military euphemisms for folk blown to bits in a wedding party or something. Over on Public Intelligence Blog Aug 25 it is suggested that intelligence now is behaving like Porn pedlar's in 1979, not accepting that most of their product is now given away free online. They need to evolve.

    ReplyDelete